Adoption of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy For Early-Stage Breast Cancer From 2004 Through 2011

被引:18
作者
Wang, Elyn H. [1 ]
Mougalian, Sarah S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Soulos, Pamela R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Smith, Benjamin D. [5 ]
Haffty, Bruce G. [6 ]
Gross, Cary P. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Yu, James B. [1 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Canc Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Canc Outcomes Publ Policy & Effectiveness Res Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2015年 / 91卷 / 02期
关键词
ACTIVE BREATHING CONTROL; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; IRRADIATION; COSMESIS; HOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiation therapy (RT) that has been increasingly adopted as an adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). IMRT may result in improved cosmesis compared to standard RT, although at greater expense. To investigate the adoption of IMRT, we examined trends and factors associated with IMRT in women under the age of 65 with early stage breast cancer. Methods and Materials: We performed a retrospective study of early stage breast cancer patients treated with BCS followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) who were <= 65 years old in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2011. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with receipt of IMRT (vs standard RT). Results: We identified 11,089 women with early breast cancer (9.6%) who were treated with IMRT and 104,448 (90.4%) who were treated with standard RT, after BCS. The proportion of WBI patients receiving IMRT increased yearly from 2004 to 2009, with 5.3% of WBI patients receiving IMRT in 2004 and 11.6% receiving IMRT in 2009. Further use of IMRT declined afterward, with the proportion remaining steady at 11.0% and 10.7% in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Patients treated in nonacademic community centers were more likely to receive IMRT (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.43 for nonacademic vs academic center). Compared to privately insured patients, the uninsured patients (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95) and those with Medicaid insurance (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) were less likely to receive IMRT. Conclusions: The use of IMRT rose from 2004 to 2009 and then stabilized. Important nonclinical factors associated with IMRT use included facility type and insurance status. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 311
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The Sources of the SGR "Hole"
    Alhassani, Ali
    Chandra, Amitabh
    Chernew, Michael E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (04) : 289 - 291
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, CTR MED MED SERV MED
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, CTR MED MED SERV MED
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, NCDB PART US FIL
  • [5] [Anonymous], NATL CANC DATA BASE
  • [6] Is multibeam IMRT better than standard treatment for patients with left-sided breast cancer?
    Beckham, Wayne A.
    Popescu, Carmen C.
    Patenaude, Veronica V.
    Wai, Elaine S.
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : 918 - 924
  • [7] Simplified intensity-modulated radiotherapy using pre-defined segments to reduce cardiac complications in left-sided breast cancer
    Cho, BCJ
    Schwarz, M
    Mijnheer, BJ
    Bartelink, H
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 70 (03) : 231 - 241
  • [8] CLEMENS J., 2013, Bargaining in the Shadow of a Giant: Medicare's Influence on Private Payment Systems
  • [9] Dayes I, 2012, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V24, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2012.05.003
  • [10] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241