Jurisdictional control of public health policies through the inclusion of medicines in the list of essential medicines of the Unified Health System

被引:0
作者
Dal Pozzo, Emerson Luis [1 ]
Mion, Ronaldo de Paula [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Curitiba, UNICURITIBA, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Direito, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
来源
A&C-REVISTA DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO & CONSTITUCIONAL | 2019年 / 19卷 / 77期
关键词
Fundamental right to health; Medicines; Objective dimension; Public policy; Jurisdictional control; INSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES; FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT; JUDICIAL CONTROL; SUPREME-COURT; RIGHTS; CONSTITUTIONALISM; BRAZIL; LIMITS;
D O I
10.21056/aec.v19i77.1113
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The supply of medicines is one of the pretensions that derive from the fundamental social right to health, and to promote this right and balance the public accounts, the State - through the Unified Health System - uses an important instrument, that is the List of Essential Medicines. The medicines lists enumerate the drugs that must meet the health priorities of the Brazilian population, and thus are part of public health policy strategies. Usually, essential medicines are not in the lists, which entails numerous judicial demands of an individual nature, many of them involving the same drug. From the objective dimension of fundamental rights, we intend to develop in this study an analysis about the possibility of carrying out judicial control of public policies through collective that mandate the State the inclusion of a specific drug in the list of essential medicines.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 228
页数:30
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   Interinstitutional health dialogues and the NAT-JUS deployment experience [J].
Mariano, Cynara Monteiro ;
Furtado, Emanuel Teofilo ;
Albuquerque, Felipe Braga ;
Coelho da Silva Pereira, Fabricia Helena Linhares .
REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 5 (01) :169-188
[32]   The judicial control of health policies and actions in Brazil [J].
Marques, Silvia Badim .
REVISTA DE DIREITO SANITARIO-JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2016, 17 (01) :100-105
[33]   THE GUARANTEE OF THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE: THE FUNCTION OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND THE POLITICIAN SYSTEM [J].
Marques, Silvia Badim .
REVISTA DE DIREITO SANITARIO-JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2006, 7 (1-3) :195-217
[34]   The principle of the dignity of human person: a reading of the effectiveness of citizenship and human rights through the challenges put forward by globalization [J].
Mezzaroba, Orides ;
Da Silveira, Vladmir Oliveira .
REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 5 (01) :273-293
[35]  
Moraes Alexandre de., 2004, Direito constitucional, V15
[36]  
NOVAIS Jorge Reis., 2003, As restricoes aos Direitos Fundamentais nao expressamente autorizadas pela Constituicao
[37]   Separation of powers and institutional dialogues in health litigation [J].
Oliveira Avila, Ana Paula ;
Correa de Melo, Karen Cristina .
REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 5 (01) :83-108
[38]  
Pessoa FMG, 2015, A C-REV DIREITO ADM, V15, P117
[39]   Constitutionalism and rights protection in Mexico and Brazil: comparative remarks [J].
Pou Gimenez, Francisca .
REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 5 (03) :233-256
[40]  
Pulido CarlosBernal., 2007, PRINCIPIO PROPORCION