Establishing a Safe Container for Learning in Simulation The Role of the Presimulation Briefing

被引:485
作者
Rudolph, Jenny W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Raemer, Daniel B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simon, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Med Simulat, Boston, MA USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
Debriefing; Prebrief; Psychological safety; Realism; Education;
D O I
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Statement In the absence of theoretical or empirical agreement on how to establish and maintain engagement in instructor-led health care simulation debriefings, we organize a set of promising practices we have identified in closely related fields and our own work. We argue that certain practices create a psychologically safe context for learning, a so-called safe container. Establishing a safe container, in turn, allows learners to engage actively in simulation plus debriefings despite possible disruptions to that engagement such as unrealistic aspects of the simulation, potential threats to their professional identity, or frank discussion of mistakes. Establishing a psychologically safe context includes the practices of (1) clarifying expectations, (2) establishing a fiction contract with participants, (3) attending to logistic details, and (4) declaring and enacting a commitment to respecting learners and concern for their psychological safety. As instructors collaborate with learners to perform these practices, consistency between what instructors say and do may also impact learners' engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 349
页数:11
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [1] Darling, M., Parry, C., Moore, J., Learning in the thick of it (2005) Harv Bus Rev, 83 (7), pp. 84-92
  • [2] Baker, A.C., Jensen, P.J., Kolb, D.A., In conversation: Transforming experience into learning (1997) Simul Gaming, 28, pp. 6-12
  • [3] Lederman, L.C., Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice (1992) Simul Gaming, 23 (2), pp. 145-160
  • [4] Rudolph, J.W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R.L., There's no such thing as a non-judgmental debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment (2006) Simul Healthc, 1 (1), pp. 49-55
  • [5] Kolb, D.A., (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience As the Source of Learning and Development, , Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice Hall
  • [6] Dieckmann, P., Gaba, D., Rall, M., Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice (2007) Simul Healthc, 2 (3), pp. 183-193
  • [7] Williams, M., Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries (2007) Acad Manag Rev, 32 (2), pp. 595-621
  • [8] Mann, K., Van Der Vleuten, C., Eva, K., Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict (2011) Acad Med, 86 (9), pp. 1120-1127
  • [9] Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model (2010) Acad Med, 85 (7), pp. 1212-1220
  • [10] Dismukes, R.K., McDonnell, L.K., Jobe, K.K., Facilitating LOFT debriefings: Instructor techniques and crew participation (2000) Int J Aviat Psychol, 10, pp. 35-57