Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem, Rania [1 ]
Mulla, Zaheeda [2 ]
Ghassal, Nour [3 ]
Bokhary, Ayman [1 ]
Howladar, Fatimah [4 ]
Fallatah, Kholoud [4 ]
Iskandarani, Omar [5 ]
Attar, Mohammad [5 ]
Ujaimi, Reem [5 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Med Sch, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2021年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; LOCOREGIONAL RADIATION-THERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; PLAN QUALITY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the dosimetric effect of Breast Cancer (BC) patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Methodology: This retrospective study enrolled 53 BC women, treated with VMAT between Oct 2013 and Nov 2018. The fractionation was within 40 Gray-50 Gray (Gy) in 15-25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), Mean Heart Dose (MHD), and doses to the Ipsilateral Lung (IPL) and Mean Contralateral Breast (MCB) were analyzed. Results: Dosimetric results for 50 Gy/25 Fx showed, D98% (mean ? standard deviation) was 47.5? 0.8 Gy, PTV D2% was 53 +/- 0.4 Gy, and D50% was 51 +/- 0.3 Gy. The maximum point dose (Dmax), mean +/- SD was 110 +/- (1.4) and the minimum point dose (Dmin), was 72 +/- (9.1). The HI and CI were 0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.1 +/- 0.07. The average MHD was 10.6 +/- 3.3 Gy, and the MCB dose 4.5 +/- 1.4 Gy, IPL V20Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. For hypofractionated dose, D98% (mean dose +/- SD) was 41 +/- 1.6 Gy, PTV D2% was 45 +/- 01.9 Gy and, D50 was 43 +/- 1.8 Gy. The Dmax, mean +/- SD was 111 +/- (5.0) and the Dmin, mean +/- SD was 75 +/- (11). The HI and CI were 0.1 +/- 0.02, and 0.1 +/- 0.34. The average MHD was 10.5 +/- 3.55 Gy, MCB 3.7 +/- 1.4 G, IPL V20 Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. Conclusion: VMAT is favorable with complex patient anatomy or when the internal mammary region is included.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Ren, Wenting
    Sun, Chao
    Lu, Ningning
    Xu, Yingjie
    Han, Fei
    Liu, Yue Ping
    Dai, Jianrong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 254 - 262
  • [22] Dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for children with neuroblastoma
    Liu, Xia
    Liu, Zhikai
    Pang, Tingtian
    Dong, Tingting
    Qiu, Jie
    PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION, 2020, 4 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [23] Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and a hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy and segmented field-in-field technique for postmastectomy chest wall and regional lymph node irradiation
    Lang, Karen
    Loritz, Brianne
    Schwartz, Adam
    Hunzeker, Ashley
    Lenards, Nishele
    Culp, Lee
    Finley, Randi
    Corbin, Kimberly S.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [24] Late rectal bleeding after volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localised prostatic cancer
    Naoi, Yutaka
    Yamada, Kana
    Kurokawa, Chie
    Kunogi, Hiroaki
    Sakamoto, Yoshiro
    Sasai, Keisuke
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (02) : 165 - 168
  • [25] Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients
    Deng, Xia
    Han, Ce
    Chen, Shan
    Xie, Congying
    Yi, Jinling
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Jin, Xiance
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [26] Dual partial arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy: The game changer for accelerated hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated tumor cavity boost in early breast cancer - A comparative dosimetric study with single partial arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Mondal, Dodul
    Julka, Pramod Kumar
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Laviraj, Macharla Anjaneyelu
    Jana, Manisha
    Kamal, Vineet Kumar
    Deo, Suryanarayan V. S.
    Guleria, Randeep
    Rath, Goura K.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (05) : 1005 - 1010
  • [27] Treatment planning evaluation for bilateral breast cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
    Abdullah, Siham Sabah
    Alabedi, Haydar H.
    Taha, Jenan Hussein
    Abdullah, Khalid
    REVISTA DE SENOLOGIA Y PATOLOGIA MAMARIA, 2023, 36 (01):
  • [28] Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: An Updated Review
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Chang, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Nalee
    Kim, Yong Bae
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Kyubo
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2022, 25 (05) : 349 - 365
  • [29] Incidental testicular doses during volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients
    Onal, Cem
    Bozca, Recep
    Dolek, Yemliha
    Guler, Ozan Cem
    Arslan, Gungor
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2020, 125 (08): : 777 - 783
  • [30] Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the treatment of esophageal cancer patients
    Martini, Stefania
    Arcadipane, Francesca
    Strignano, Paolo
    Spadi, Rosella
    Contu, Viviana
    Fiandra, Christian
    Ragona, Riccardo
    Catalano, Giorgia
    Satolli, Maria Antonietta
    Camandona, Michele
    Romagnoli, Renato
    Ricardi, Umberto
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 35 (12)