Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem, Rania [1 ]
Mulla, Zaheeda [2 ]
Ghassal, Nour [3 ]
Bokhary, Ayman [1 ]
Howladar, Fatimah [4 ]
Fallatah, Kholoud [4 ]
Iskandarani, Omar [5 ]
Attar, Mohammad [5 ]
Ujaimi, Reem [5 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Dept Med Sch, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2021年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; LOCOREGIONAL RADIATION-THERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; PLAN QUALITY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the dosimetric effect of Breast Cancer (BC) patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Methodology: This retrospective study enrolled 53 BC women, treated with VMAT between Oct 2013 and Nov 2018. The fractionation was within 40 Gray-50 Gray (Gy) in 15-25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), Mean Heart Dose (MHD), and doses to the Ipsilateral Lung (IPL) and Mean Contralateral Breast (MCB) were analyzed. Results: Dosimetric results for 50 Gy/25 Fx showed, D98% (mean ? standard deviation) was 47.5? 0.8 Gy, PTV D2% was 53 +/- 0.4 Gy, and D50% was 51 +/- 0.3 Gy. The maximum point dose (Dmax), mean +/- SD was 110 +/- (1.4) and the minimum point dose (Dmin), was 72 +/- (9.1). The HI and CI were 0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.1 +/- 0.07. The average MHD was 10.6 +/- 3.3 Gy, and the MCB dose 4.5 +/- 1.4 Gy, IPL V20Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. For hypofractionated dose, D98% (mean dose +/- SD) was 41 +/- 1.6 Gy, PTV D2% was 45 +/- 01.9 Gy and, D50 was 43 +/- 1.8 Gy. The Dmax, mean +/- SD was 111 +/- (5.0) and the Dmin, mean +/- SD was 75 +/- (11). The HI and CI were 0.1 +/- 0.02, and 0.1 +/- 0.34. The average MHD was 10.5 +/- 3.55 Gy, MCB 3.7 +/- 1.4 G, IPL V20 Gy 31.5 +/- 4.7%. Conclusion: VMAT is favorable with complex patient anatomy or when the internal mammary region is included.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for adjuvant treatment of bilateral breast cancer
    Phurailatpam, Reena
    Wadasadawala, Tabassum
    Chauhan, Kamalnayan
    Panda, Subhajit
    Sarin, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [2] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [3] Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for whole breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of different arc designs
    Ramasubramanian, Velayudham
    Balaji, Karunakaran
    Subramanian, Sitaraman Balaji
    Sathiya, Krishnamoorthi
    Thirunavukarasu, Moorthi
    Radha, Chandrasekaran Anu
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (06): : 546 - 554
  • [4] Tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy
    Viren, Tuomas
    Heikkila, Janne
    Myllyoja, Kimmo
    Koskela, Kristiina
    Lahtinen, Tapani
    Seppala, Jan
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [5] Dosimetric comparison of complete block in ovarian protection between helical tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for cervical cancer
    Liu, Xianfeng
    Wu, Furong
    Jin, Fu
    Sun, Fu
    Li, Qicheng
    Guo, Mingfang
    Zhao, Xiujuan
    Guo, Qishuai
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [6] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
    Bai, Wei
    Kou, Changgui
    Yu, Weiying
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Hua, Wanqing
    Yu, Lei
    Wang, Jianfeng
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 : 7179 - 7186
  • [7] Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes: the advantage of dosimetric data and safety of toxicities
    Doi, Yoshiko
    Nakao, Minoru
    Miura, Hideharu
    Ozawa, Shuichi
    Kenjo, Masahiro
    Nagata, Yasushi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 61 (05) : 747 - 754
  • [8] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): A modern radiotherapy technique - A single institutional experience
    Rashid, Azhar
    Ahmed, Zaeem
    Memom, Muhammad Ali
    Hashim, Abdul Sattar M.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 (02) : 355 - 361
  • [9] Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and field-in-field technique for synchronous bilateral breast cancer
    Cheng, Hao-Wen
    Chang, Chih-Chieh
    Shiau, An-Cheng
    Wang, Ming-Hua
    Tsai, Jo-Ting
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison between interstitial brachytherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for tumor bed boost in breast cancer
    Periasamy, Kannan
    Karunanithi, Gunaseelan
    Cholayil, Shamsudheen
    Dharanipragada, Kadambari
    Neelakanadan, Vijayprabhu
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (03) : 302 - 309