Protein docking using an ensemble of spin labels optimized by intra-molecular paramagnetic relaxation enhancement

被引:9
|
作者
Schilder, Jesika [1 ]
Liu, Wei-Min [1 ]
Kumar, Pravin [2 ]
Overhand, Mark [1 ]
Huber, Martina [2 ]
Ubbink, Marcellus [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Leiden Inst Chem, Gorlaeus Labs, Einsteinweg 55, NL-2333 CC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Huygens Kamerlingh Onnes Lab, Dept Phys, Niels Bohrweg 2, NL-2333 CA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
CYTOCHROME-C PEROXIDASE; MOLECULAR-STRUCTURE DETERMINATION; TRANSIENT ENCOUNTER COMPLEXES; NMR-SPECTROSCOPY; YEAST ISO-1-CYTOCHROME-C; BINDING-PROTEIN; CHEMICAL-SHIFTS; XPLOR-NIH; DYNAMICS; ASSIGNMENT;
D O I
10.1039/c5cp03781f
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Paramagnetic NMR is a useful technique to study proteins and protein complexes and the use of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) for this purpose has become wide-spread. PREs are commonly generated using paramagnetic spin labels (SLs) that contain an unpaired electron in the form of a nitroxide radical, with 1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-2,5-dihydropyrrol-3-ylmethyl methane thiosulfonate (MTSL) being the most popular tag. The inherent flexibility of the SL causes sampling of several conformations in solution, which can be problematic as over- or underestimation of the spatial distribution of the unpaired electron in structural calculations will lead to errors in the distance restraints. We investigated the effect of this mobility on the accuracy of protein protein docking calculations using intermolecular PRE data by comparing MTSL and the less mobile 3-methanesulfonilthiomethyl-4-(pyridin-3-yI)-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-1-yloxyl (pyMTSL) on the dynamic complex of cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase. No significant differences were found between the two SLs. Docking was performed using either single or multiple conformers and either fixed or flexible SLs. It was found that mobility of the SLs is the limiting factor for obtaining accurate solutions. Optimization of SL conformer orientations using intra-molecular PRE improves the accuracy of docking.
引用
收藏
页码:5729 / 5742
页数:14
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Simultaneous detection of intra- and inter-molecular paramagnetic relaxation enhancements in protein complexes
    Olivieri, Cristina
    Subrahmanian, Manu Veliparambil
    Xia, Youlin
    Kim, Jonggul
    Porcelli, Fernando
    Veglia, Gianluigi
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR, 2018, 70 (03) : 133 - 140
  • [2] Characterizing Dynamic Protein-Protein Interactions Using Differentially Scaled Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement
    Yu, Dongmei
    Volkov, Alexander N.
    Tang, Chun
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 131 (47) : 17291 - 17297
  • [3] Theory and practice of using solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement to characterize protein conformational dynamics
    Gong, Zhou
    Schwieters, Charles D.
    Tang, Chun
    METHODS, 2018, 148 : 48 - 56
  • [4] Extending the Experimentally Accessible Range of Spin Dipole-Dipole Spectral Densities for Protein-Cosolute Interactions by Temperature-Dependent Solvent Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement Measurements
    Okuno, Yusuke
    Clore, G. Marius
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2023, 127 (37) : 7887 - 7898
  • [5] Study of a DNA Duplex by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Validation of Pulsed Dipolar Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Distance Measurements Using Triarylmethyl-Based Spin Labels
    Lomzov, Alexander A.
    Sviridov, Eugeniy A.
    Shernuykov, Andrey V.
    Shevelev, Georgiy Yu.
    Pyshnyi, Dmitrii V.
    Bagryanskaya, Elena G.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2016, 120 (23) : 5125 - 5133
  • [6] Structure determination of uniformly 13C, 15N labeled protein using qualitative distance restraints from MAS solid-state 13C-NMR observed paramagnetic relaxation enhancement
    Tamaki, Hajime
    Egawa, Ayako
    Kido, Kouki
    Kameda, Tomoshi
    Kamiya, Masakatsu
    Kikukawa, Takashi
    Aizawa, Tomoyasu
    Fujiwara, Toshimichi
    Demura, Makoto
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR, 2016, 64 (01) : 87 - 101