Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases

被引:11
作者
Wang, Honggang [1 ]
Zhou, Yue [1 ]
Zhang, Zhengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Xinqiao Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 183 Xinqiao St, Chongqing 400037, Peoples R China
关键词
Dysesthesia; Dorsal root ganglion; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; INSTABILITY; DISKECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; INFECTION; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-015-4365-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (misTLIF) can potentially lead to dorsal root ganglion (DRG) injury which may cause postoperative dysesthesia (POD). The purpose of retrospective study was to describe the uncommon complication of POD in misTLIF. Methods Between January 2010 and December 2014, 539 patients were treated with misTLIF in investigator group. POD was defined as dysesthetic pain or burning dysesthesia at a proper DRG innervated region, whether spontaneous or evoked. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, central non-opioid analgesic agent, neuropathic pain drugs and/or intervertebral foramen block were selectively used to treat POD. Results There were five cases of POD (5/539, 0.9 %), which consisted of one patient in recurrent lumbar disc herniation (1/36, 3 %), one patient in far lateral lumbar disc herniation (1/34, 3 %), and 3 patients in lumbar spondylolisthesis (3/201, 1 %). Two DRG injury cases were confirmed by revision surgery. After the treatment by drugs administration plus DRG block, all patients presented pain relief with duration from 22 to 50 days. A gradual pain moving to distal end of a proper DRG innervated region was found as the beginning of end. Conclusions Although POD is a unique and rare complication and maybe misdiagnosed as nerve root injury in misTLIF, combination drug therapy and DRG block have an effective result of pain relief. The appearance of a gradual pain moving to distal end of a proper DRG innervated region during recovery may be used as a sign for the good prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1600
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction [J].
Farber, S. Harrison ;
Dugan, Robert K. ;
White, Michael D. ;
Walker, Corey T. ;
O'Neill, Luke K. ;
Alan, Nima ;
Zhou, James J. ;
Turner, Jay D. ;
Tumialan, Luis M. ;
Uribe, Juan S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 39 (06) :785-792
[42]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques [J].
Tender, G. C. ;
Serban, D. .
CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) :812-821
[43]   How Does Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Influence Lumbar Radiologic Parameters? [J].
Pereira, Claudia ;
Silva, Pedro Santos ;
Cunha, Marisa ;
Vaz, Rui ;
Pereira, Paulo .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 :E895-E902
[44]   Tubular Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion is Superior to a Midline Incision With Cortical Screws for a Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion [J].
Mayo, Benjamin C. ;
Singh, Kern .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (04) :131-133
[45]   A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis [J].
Chan, Andrew K. ;
Bisson, Erica F. ;
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Foley, Kevin T. ;
Potts, Eric A. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher, I ;
Shaffrey, Mark E. ;
Coric, Domagoj ;
Knightly, John J. ;
Park, Paul ;
Wang, Michael Y. ;
Fu, Kai-Ming ;
Slotkin, Jonathan R. ;
Asher, Anthony L. ;
Virk, Michael S. ;
Kerezoudis, Panagiotis ;
Alvi, Mohammed Ali ;
Guan, Jian ;
Haid, Regis W. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen, V .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (05)
[46]   Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Bindal, Rajesh K. ;
Ghosh, Subrata .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (02) :126-132
[47]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) [J].
Saela, Stephen ;
Pompliano, Michael ;
Varghese, Jeffrey ;
Sinha, Kumar ;
Faloon, Michael ;
Emami, Arash .
JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (04)
[48]   Comparison of Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-analysis [J].
Xiao, Shanwen ;
Zhou, Shufang ;
Pan, Shixin ;
Ning, Jinpei ;
Gan, Xiutian ;
Guan, Yanhua .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (02) :56-66
[49]   Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Arvind G. Kulkarni ;
Hussain Bohra ;
Abhilash Dhruv ;
Abhishek Sarraf ;
Anupreet Bassi ;
Vishwanath M. Patil .
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 :464-472
[50]   Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Diseases: A Matched Case-Control [J].
Shi, Liang ;
Ding, Tao ;
Shi, Yihua ;
Wang, Fang ;
Wu, Chengcong .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 :E1231-E1240