The effect of aeration rate on forced-aeration composting of chicken manure and sawdust

被引:145
作者
Gao, Mengchun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bing [1 ]
Yu, An [1 ]
Liang, Fangyuan [1 ]
Yang, Lijuan [1 ]
Sun, Yanxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Ocean Univ China, Minist Educ, Key Lab Marine Environm Sci & Ecol, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Composting; Chicken manure; Sawdust; Aeration rate; CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITY; COAL FLY-ASH; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; POULTRY MANURE; CATTLE MANURE; WASTE; MATURITY; TEMPERATURE; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.027
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The composting of chicken manure and sawdust has been investigated in forced-aeration composting systems at aeration rates of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.71 min(-1) kg(-1) organic matter (OM), corresponding to pile A, pile B, and pile C. The temperature exceeding 55 degrees C in pile A and pile B remained more than three consecutive days, but only 2 days were above 55 degrees C in pile C. The final electrical conductivity (EC) did not exceed the limit content of 3000 mu s cm(-1) in the three piles, and the cation exchange capacity (CEC) met the requirement maturity degree of over 60 cmol kg(-1). The OM loss contents in pile A, pile B, and pile C were 14%, 15.4%, and 12.8%, respectively, corresponding to the final C/N ratio of 17.1, 16.2, and 18.3. The final NH(4)(+)-N content in pile A did not meet the limit value of 400 mg kg(-1), respectively, and the NO(3)(-)-N was 1942, 2190, and 1638 mg kg(-1) in pile A, pile 13, and pile C. The final germination index (GI) for pile A, pile B, and pile C was 90.2%, 95.2%, and 79.4%. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1899 / 1903
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Mass and thermal balance during composting of a poultry manure - Wood shavings mixture at different aeration rates [J].
Ahn, H. K. ;
Richard, T. L. ;
Choi, H. L. .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 42 (02) :215-223
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review [J].
Bernal, M. P. ;
Alburquerque, J. A. ;
Moral, R. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (22) :5444-5453
[4]  
Chen J.H., 1999, 1999 ANIMAL WASTE PR, P15
[5]   Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. II: nitrogen turnover and losses [J].
Eklind, Y ;
Kirchmann, H .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 74 (02) :125-133
[6]   Co-composting of sewage sludge and coal fly ash: nutrient transformations [J].
Fang, M ;
Wong, JWC ;
Ma, KK ;
Wong, MH .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 67 (01) :19-24
[7]   The evaluation of stability and maturity during the composting of cattle manure [J].
Gomez-Brandon, Maria ;
Lazcano, Cristina ;
Dominguez, Jorge .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2008, 70 (03) :436-444
[8]   Development of composting technology in animal waste treatment - Review [J].
Haga, K .
ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1999, 12 (04) :604-606
[9]   THE MEASUREMENT OF THE CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITY OF COMPOSTS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF THE DEGREE OF MATURITY [J].
HARADA, Y ;
INOKO, A .
SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 1980, 26 (01) :127-134
[10]  
HIRAI MF, 1983, BIOCYCLE, V24, P54