What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data?

被引:67
作者
Keightley, Peter D. [1 ]
Eyre-Walker, Adam [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Sch Biol Sci, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Sussex, Ctr Study Evolut, Brighton BN1 9QG, E Sussex, England
[3] Univ Sussex, Sch Life Sci, Brighton BN1 9QG, E Sussex, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
mutation; selection; distribution of effects; parameter inference; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS; BACKGROUND SELECTION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEUTRAL THEORY; MITOCHONDRIAL; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS; GENES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2009.0266
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We investigate several questions concerning the inference of the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations from the distribution of nucleotide frequencies in a population sample. If a fixed sequencing effort is available, we find that the optimum strategy is to sequence a modest number of alleles (approx. 10). If full genome information is available, the accuracy of parameter estimates increases as the number of alleles sequenced increases, but with diminishing returns. It is unlikely that the DFE for single genes can be reliably estimated in organisms such as humans and Drosophila, unless genes are very large and we sequence hundreds or perhaps thousands of alleles. We consider models involving several discrete classes of mutations in which the selection strength and density apportioned to each class can vary. Models with three classes fit almost as well as four class models unless many hundreds of alleles are sequenced. Large numbers of alleles need to be sequenced to accurately estimate the distribution's mean and variance. Estimating complex DFEs may therefore be difficult. Finally, we examine models involving slightly advantageous mutations. We show that the distribution of the absolute strength of selection is well estimated if mutations are assumed to be unconditionally deleterious.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1193
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments? [J].
Abramson, Scott F. ;
Kocak, Korhan ;
Magazinnik, Asya .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 66 (04) :1008-1020
[32]   Credit Card Debt and Consumer Payment Choice: What Can We Learn from Credit Bureau Data? [J].
Stavins, Joanna .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (01) :59-90
[33]   Ontology-driven analysis of marine metagenomics: what more can we learn from our data? [J].
Blumberg, Kai ;
Miller, Matthew ;
Ponsero, Alise ;
Hurwitz, Bonnie .
GIGASCIENCE, 2023, 12
[34]   What can we learn from HF signal scattered from a discrete arc? [J].
Seran, E. ;
Godefroy, M. ;
Kauristie, K. ;
Cerisier, J. -C. ;
Berthelier, J. -J. ;
Lester, M. ;
Sarri, L. -E. .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2009, 27 (05) :1887-1896
[35]   Venturing Beyond Beans and Peas: What Can We Learn from Chamaecrista? [J].
Singer, Susan R. ;
Maki, Sonja L. ;
Farmer, Andrew D. ;
Ilut, Dan ;
May, Gregory D. ;
Cannon, Steven B. ;
Doyle, Jeff J. .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 151 (03) :1041-1047
[36]   What Can We Learn from Rethinking 'Multiculturalism' in Social Work Education? [J].
Nadan, Yochay ;
Ben-Ari, Adital .
SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2013, 32 (08) :1089-1102
[37]   Changing handedness: What can we learn from preference shift studies? [J].
Marcori, Alexandre Jehan ;
Martins Monteiro, Pedro Henrique ;
Alves Okazaki, Victor Hugo .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 107 :313-319
[38]   Outside options and wages: What can we learn from subjective assessments? [J].
Lachowska, Marta .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 52 (01) :79-121
[39]   The gender pay gap: what can we learn from Northern Ireland? [J].
Jones, Melanie ;
Kaya, Ezgi .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2022, 74 (01) :94-114
[40]   Magma chambers: what we can, and cannot, learn from volcano geodesy [J].
Segall, Paul .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2019, 377 (2139)