Service Performance - Between Measurement and Information in the Public Sector

被引:3
作者
Coste, Andreea-Ioana [1 ]
Tiron-Tudor, Adriana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Babes Bolyai, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Cluj Napoca 400591, Romania
来源
LOGOS UNIVERSALITY MENTALITY EDUCATION NOVELTY (LUMEN 2013) | 2013年 / 92卷
关键词
service performance; public sector; performance measurement; service performance information; RESEARCH AGENDA;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.662
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Around the world, performance in general and service performance in particular has different meanings, and there is no consensus about the concept, the measurement and information to be provided. In the context of public sector, an essential step is to establish the main features of service performance. Also, adequate measurements are necessary in use and for ensuring transparency of the use of public funds for satisfying the social needs of the users. This paper aims to identify the main characteristics that define the concept of service performance in the public sector to see how it can be measured and what information must be provided, using a deeply analyze of the relevant international literature. The current research provides a comprehensive framework of service performance in the public sector, useful for a large group of interested parties from which we mention just the most significance, like governments, managers, citizens, international organizations that provide financial aid. Improving the quality of service performance is an evolutionary process that builds on research, experimentation and practical experience. Service performance in the public sector entities should provide a high quality information, the way in which funds are allocate should be in a transparent way, efficient use of resources without raising questions on the use of resources and eliminate mistrust in the quality of services. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MANUFACTURING ENG
[2]  
Arnaboldi M., 2010, CRIT PERSPECT, V21, P266, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2010.01.016, 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.01.016]
[3]  
Athanassopoulos A. D., 2003, USING FRONTIER EFFIC, DOI [10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00187-5, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00187-5]
[4]   LEARNING TO MEASURE PERFORMANCE - THE USE OF INDICATORS IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
CARTER, N .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1991, 69 (01) :85-101
[5]   Paradoxes of public sector customer service [J].
Fountain, JE .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2001, 14 (01) :55-73
[6]   Chasing shadows? Performance measurement of policy advice in New Zealand government departments [J].
Gregory, Robert ;
Lonti, Zsuzsanna .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 86 (03) :837-856
[7]   Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance [J].
Halachmi, Arie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 54 (07) :502-516
[8]   A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS [J].
HOOD, C .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1991, 69 (01) :3-19
[9]  
IPSASB, 2011, CONS PAP REP SERV PE
[10]  
IPSASB, 2008, CONS PAP DEV PERF ME