Pollination services provided to small and large highbush blueberry fields by wild and managed bees

被引:151
|
作者
Isaacs, Rufus [1 ]
Kirk, Anna K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
ecosystem service; honey bee; integrated crop pollination; native bee; pollinator; NATIVE BEES; VACCINIUM; HYMENOPTERA; APOIDEA; CONSERVATION; DIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; HABITAT; REQUIREMENTS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01823.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
P>1. Plantings of pollinator-dependent crops vary from large, intensively managed fields to small fields that are managed less intensively, yet there is relatively little information on how pollinator populations and their contribution to crop productivity vary across this gradient. 2. We determined the relative importance of wild bees and managed honey bees Apis mellifera L. for crop pollination in the blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum L. system of Michigan, USA, by comparing bee communities in small, isolated blueberry fields with those in large blueberry fields (stocked with managed honey bee hives) and measuring the difference in yields of open-pollinated and pollinator-excluded clusters of flowers. We combined these assessments to calculate the contribution of bees to crop production in this system. 3. Wild bees were the dominant pollinators in small fields, comprising 58% of flower-visiting bees, whereas 97% of bees in large fields were honey bees. Large fields had four times as many bees visiting flowers than small fields, but only one-tenth as many bumble bees as small fields. 4. Levels of fruit set exceeded 85% in all fields and were similar between field sizes. Berry weight increased with flower exposure to pollinators and was positively correlated with bee abundance. Berry weights from open-pollinated flowers were twice as high in large fields compared with small fields. 5. By combining berry weight increases attributable to honey bees and wild bees in blueberry fields with measurements of the bee community adjusted for pollinator efficiency, we calculated the relative contributions of honey bees and wild bees to pollination of Michigan blueberries. We estimate that wild bees provide 82% of the pollination in small fields but only 12% of the total pollination services across this system, mostly through their secondary role in large fields. 6. Synthesis and applications. Wild bees are the primary pollinators of small blueberry fields, but these insects are at low abundance in large fields, perhaps due to a lack of nesting resources or competition for resources with honey bees. Our findings highlight the dependence of commercial fruit producers on honey bees and suggest that increasing the pollination contribution of other bees, particularly bumble bees, in large fields will require that growers adopt wild bee conservation strategies or stock their fields with managed colonies. Quantifying the contributions of managed and wild pollinating bees across the range of crop production scenarios will help to direct development of integrated crop pollination strategies to minimize the risk of pollination deficits affecting food production.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 849
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Variation in highbush blueberry floral volatile profiles as a function of pollination status, cultivar, time of day and flower part: implications for flower visitation by bees
    Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar
    Parra, Leonardo
    Quiroz, Andres
    Isaacs, Rufus
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2011, 107 (08) : 1377 - 1390
  • [32] Comparison of the pollination efficiency of Apis cerana with wild bees in oil-seed camellia fields
    Li, Hong-Ying
    Luo, An-Cai
    Hao, You-Jin
    Dou, Fei-Yue
    Kou, Ruo-Mei
    Orr, Michael C.
    Zhu, Chao-Dong
    Huang, Dun-Yuan
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 56 : 250 - 258
  • [33] Distribution and pollination services of wild bees and hoverflies along an altitudinal gradient in mountain hay meadows
    Baumann, Kevin
    Keune, Julia
    Wolters, Volkmar
    Jauker, Frank
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (16): : 11345 - 11351
  • [34] Landscape characteristics predict body sizes in wild bees: implications for pollination services and foraging range
    Elzay, Sarah DePaolo
    Baum, Kristen A.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2021, 25 (02) : 243 - 253
  • [35] Effects of Natural Habitat Loss and Edge Effects on Wild Bees and Pollination Services in Remnant Prairies
    Olynyk, Marika
    Westwood, A. Richard
    Koper, Nicola
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 50 (03) : 732 - 743
  • [36] Landscape characteristics predict body sizes in wild bees: implications for pollination services and foraging range
    Sarah DePaolo Elzay
    Kristen A. Baum
    Journal of Insect Conservation, 2021, 25 : 243 - 253
  • [37] Assessing the role of dispersed floral resources for managed bees in providing supporting ecosystem services for crop pollination
    Melin, Annalie
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Colville, Jonathan F.
    Midgley, Jeremy J.
    Donaldson, John S.
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [38] The timing of visits by large and small bees differentially affects pollination success in Mimulus ringens
    Mitchell, Randall J.
    Starvaggi, Dana
    Fitzgerald, Victor
    Karron, Jeffrey D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 111 (07)
  • [39] Landscape effects on wild Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) queens visiting highbush blueberry fields in south-central Chile
    Vieli, Lorena
    Davis, Frank W.
    Kendall, Bruce E.
    Altieri, Miguel
    APIDOLOGIE, 2016, 47 (05) : 711 - 716
  • [40] Landscape effects on wild Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) queens visiting highbush blueberry fields in south-central Chile
    Lorena Vieli
    Frank W. Davis
    Bruce E. Kendall
    Miguel Altieri
    Apidologie, 2016, 47 : 711 - 716