Balancing properties: A need for the application of propensity score methods in estimation of treatment effects

被引:0
作者
Urkaregi, Arantza [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-Indart, Lorea [2 ]
Ignacio Pijoan, Jose [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Dept Appl Math Stat & Operat Res, UPV EHU, Leioa, Spain
[2] BioCruces Hlth Res Inst, Madrid, Spain
[3] Cruces Univ Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Madrid, Spain
[4] Inst Salud Carlos III, Network Biomed Res Ctr Epidemiol & Publ Hlth CIBE, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Propensity score; balancing score; treatment effect; CAUSAL; SELECTION; MODELS; BIAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
There has been recently a striking increase in the use of propensity score methods in health sciences research as a tool to adjust for selection bias in making causal inferences from observational controlled studies. However, reviews of published studies that use these techniques suggest that investigators often do not pay proper attention to thorough verification of appropriate fulfilment of propensity score adjusting properties. By using a case study in which balance is not achieved, we illustrate the need to systematically asses the accomplishment of the balancing property of the propensity score as a critical requirement for obtaining unbiased treatment effects estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 284
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adelson J.L., 2013, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Fundamentals of clinical trials
[3]   The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM ;
Stukel, TA ;
Anderson, GM ;
Tu, JV .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (10) :1563-1578
[4]  
Austin PC, 2008, STAT MED, V27, P2037, DOI 10.1002/sim.3150
[5]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[6]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[7]   Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (25) :3083-3107
[8]   Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 17 (12) :1202-1217
[9]   Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Ichino, Andrea .
STATA JOURNAL, 2002, 2 (04) :358-377
[10]   Measuring balance and model selection in propensity score methods [J].
Belitser, Svetlana V. ;
Martens, Edwin P. ;
Pestman, Wiebe R. ;
Groenwold, Rolf H. H. ;
de Boer, Anthonius ;
Klungel, Olaf H. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 (11) :1115-1129