Experimental evaluation of large-scale dual-core self-centering braces and sandwiched buckling-restrained braces

被引:67
作者
Chou, Chung-Che [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Ping-Ting [1 ]
Cheng, Yu-Tsen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[2] NCREE, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB); Sandwiched buckling-restrained brace (SBRB); Cyclic tests; Residual deformation; Energy dissipation; POSTTENSIONED STEEL CONNECTIONS; SEISMIC DESIGN; FRAME; TESTS; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.030
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents structural characteristics of large-scale dual-core self-centering braces (DC-SCBs) and sandwiched buckling-restrained braces (SBRB5) in a series of cyclic tests. The DC-SCB has a flag-shaped hysteretic response with high axial stiffness and minimal residual deformation, exhibiting a self centering mechanism. The SBRB as conventional BRBs has much higher energy dissipation capacity than the DC-SCB, but larger residual deformations are expected for structures equipped with SBRB5. The primary objective of the research was to conduct experimental studies that established a direct comparison basis between DC-SCBs and SBRBs designed with similar axial capacity and length. Three SCBs and SBRBs that were about 7.5 m long and had maximum axial forces from 1500 to 6000 kN were tested to evaluate their cyclic behavior and durability. In general, these tests have shown that the DC-SCB and SBRB exhibit robust cyclic performances with good deformation capacity and durability. The axial elastic and post elastic stiffnesses of DC-SCB were around two and five times those of SBRB, indicating that the DC-SCB is more effective to resist lateral forces than the SBRB in structures, but the energy dissipation of DC-SCB was around one-third of that of SBRB. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 25
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
AISC, 2010, SEISM PROV STRUCT ST
[2]   Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength [J].
Ariyaratana, Christopher ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2011, 33 (01) :77-89
[3]   Seismic behavior of bidirectional-resistant ductile end diaphragms with buckling restrained braces in straight steel bridges [J].
Celik, Oguz C. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (02) :380-393
[4]  
Chou C-C, 2012, 9 INT C URB EARTHQ E
[5]  
Chou C-C, 2016, ENGSTRUCTS1500778R1
[6]   Evaluating performance of post-tensioned steel connections with strands and reduced flange plates [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Jun-Hen ;
Chen, Yu-Chih ;
Tsai, Keh-Chyuan .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (09) :1167-1185
[7]   Seismic design and tests of a full-scale one-story one-bay steel frame with a dual-core self-centering brace [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Wu, Tsung-Han ;
Beato, Alexis Rafael Ovalle ;
Chung, Ping-Ting ;
Chen, Ying-Chuan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 111 :435-450
[8]   Development of Steel Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces: Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests and Finite Element Analyses [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Ying-Chuan .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :247-272
[9]   Development of cross-anchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chung, Ping-Ting .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2014, 101 :19-32
[10]   Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics, modeling and seismic demands [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Ying-Chuan ;
Dinh-Hai Pham ;
Vu-Minh Truong .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 72 :26-40