Integrating LINMAP and TOPSIS methods for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making

被引:24
作者
Liu, Xiaodi [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jianjun [1 ]
Zhang, Shitao [1 ,2 ]
Hao, Jingjing [1 ]
Liu, Guodong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ Technol, Sch Math & Phys, Maanshan, Peoples R China
[3] Linyi Univ, Logist Sch, Linyi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hesitant fuzzy set; multiple attribute decision making; linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP); technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); MULTIDIMENSIONAL-ANALYSIS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; SETS; PREFERENCE; DISTANCE; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.3233/IFS-141296
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) are two well-known methods for dealing with the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems. In this paper, we further extend the LINMAP to accommodate hesitant fuzzy environment and propose a new approach to solve the MADM problems with hesitant fuzzy information. Then, an integrated method that combines the LINMAP and TOPSIS is developed. In this methodology, we take advantage of the LINMAP to determine the attribute weights objectively and thus overcome the drawbacks of the TOPSIS. Meanwhile the TOPSIS that considers both the positive ideal solution (PIS) and the negative ideal solution (NIS) can make up the disadvantages of the LINMAP. In order to measure consistency and inconsistency between the ranking order of alternatives and the decision maker's preference, two indices based on PIS and NIS are defined. Moreover, a linear programming model that can be used for minimizing the total inconsistency is constructed to determine the attribute weights. By using the TOPSIS, we obtain the most appropriate alternative. Finally, two numerical examples are given to demonstrate the implementation process of the developed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 269
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CONTROL CYBERN
[2]  
[Anonymous], MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES, DOI [DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-100608-104510, DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-042114-014927]
[3]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[4]   TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets [J].
Beg, Ismat ;
Rashid, Tabasam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) :1162-1171
[5]   A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method [J].
Boran, Fatih Emre ;
Genc, Serkan ;
Kurt, Mustafa ;
Akay, Diyar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (08) :11363-11368
[6]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[7]   Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis [J].
Chen, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Xia, Meimei .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (04) :2197-2211
[8]   The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis [J].
Chen, Ting-Yu ;
Tsao, Chueh-Yung .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2008, 159 (11) :1410-1428
[9]   Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Farhadinia, B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 240 :129-144
[10]   TOPSIS method for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making [J].
Feng, Xie ;
Zuo, Wanli ;
Wang, Junhua ;
Feng, Lizhou .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 26 (05) :2263-2269