Status of Quality in Strategic Purchasing in the Health System: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Zarei, Zahra [1 ]
Hesam, Somayeh [1 ]
Vandat, Shaghayegh [1 ]
Manesh, Alireza Oliaei [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Hlth Care Serv Management, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Care Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
来源
REVISTA DEL CUERPO MEDICO DEL HOSPITAL NACIONAL ALMANZOR AGUINAGA ASENJO | 2020年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Managed Competition; Delivery of Health Care; Integrated; Quality Assurance; Health Care; CARE; ACCESS; REFORM;
D O I
10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2020.133.737
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introducction. Strategic purchasing is an important component of financing in the health system. It can enhance productivity, justice, and accountability in the health care delivery in case of considering the quality. This study, which was conducted as a systematic review, was aimed at investigating the status of quality in five domains of strategic purchasing in the health system to answer what, for whom, from whom, how to buy, and how much to buy. Material and Methods: This study systematically reviewed the articles published in the databases of Web of Sciences (WOS), Scopus, PubMed, Medline via Ovid, Embase from 2000 to October 2019. The keywords used to search the databases included the following: Health Care Sector, Delivery of Health Care, Quality Assurance, Quality Improvement, and Strategic Purchasing. A total of 182 articles were selected and reviewed by four researchers. Articles with irrelevant content were excluded. Data of the selected articles were analyzed using the content analysis method. Results: Of the 182 articles collected through searching the selected databases, 16 articles were analyzed. Based on the results of this study, strategic purchasing in the health system results in the delivery of services with higher quality. Conclusion: Strategic purchasing can enhance the performance of the health system through choosing the most appropriate provider and the most appropriate payment method, along with equity in providing quality health care services.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 277
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] Do beneficiaries' views matter in healthcare purchasing decisions? Experiences from the Nigerian tax-funded health system and the formal sector social health insurance program of the National Health Insurance Scheme
    Ibe, Ogochukwu
    Honda, Ayako
    Etiaba, Enyi
    Ezumah, Nkoli
    Hanson, Kara
    Onwujekwe, Obinna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2017, 16
  • [12] Jadidfard Mohammad-Pooyan, 2012, Oral Health Dent Manag, V11, P189
  • [13] Strategic Purchasing in Practice: Comparing Ten European Countries
    Klasa, Katarzyna
    Greer, Scott L.
    van Ginneken, Ewout
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 122 (05) : 457 - 472
  • [14] Lee KH, 2010, BMC HLTH SERV RES S2, V10, pA17
  • [15] Stakeholders Analysis of Health Insurance Benefit Package Policy in Iran
    Mohamadi, Efat
    Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
    Rashidian, Arash
    Hassanzadeh, Ali
    Razavi, Moaven
    Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi
    [J]. HEALTH SCOPE, 2018, 7 (02):
  • [16] A Critical Analysis of Purchasing Arrangements in Kenya: The Case of the National Hospital Insurance Fund
    Munge, Kenneth
    Mulupi, Stephen
    Barasa, Edwine W.
    Chuma, Jane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (03): : 244 - 254
  • [17] The role of national health insurance for achieving UHC in the Philippines: a mixed methods analysis
    Obermann, Konrad
    Jowett, Matthew
    Kwon, Soonman
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2018, 11 (01)
  • [18] Racca Gabriella Margherita, 2011, World Hosp Health Serv, V47, P18
  • [19] Sapkota V P, 2017, J Nepal Health Res Counc, V15, P85
  • [20] Tisdel Y, 2007, HLTH PROG, V88, P69