Elevated levels of s-100β correlate with neurocognitive outcome after cardiac surgery

被引:0
作者
Farsak, B [1 ]
Gunaydin, S [1 ]
Yorgancioglu, C [1 ]
Zorlutuna, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Bayindir Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
nerve tissue protein S100; metabolism; coronary artery bypass; cardiopulmonary bypass; cardiac surgical procedures; adverse effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim S-100beta is a specific astroglial protein whose serum level increases after cerebral injury. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between elevated levels of S-100beta and the neurocognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. Methods. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were studied. Serum S-100beta levels were measured on induction of anaesthesia, at the 15(th) minute, at skin closure and on the 1(st) postoperative day. Neurocognitive outcome was evaluated by STAI-T and Zung tests preoperatively and by Minimental state examination every postoperative day until discharge. Neurocognitive tests and S-100beta levels were correlated within the scope of risk factors by Pearson correlation. Results. Serum S-100beta was not detected preoperatively. Peak serum S-100beta levels were reached at skin closure in 36:of 50 patients (72%). In 24 hours, serum S-100beta disappeared in 25 patients but was still elevated in 11 (22%). A highly significant correlation was demonstrated between the duration of CPB and peak serum S-100beta levels (r=0.91). There was a weak correlation between age and peak S-100beta levels (r=0.62). Nine patients (18%) had a positive MMSE test which correlated well with persistent high serum S-100 levels (r=0.98). Conclusion. Serum S-100beta is a promising early biochemical marker for cerebral injury following cardiac surgery within a good correlation with the CPB time, age and especially with neurocognitive tests.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[11]   A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE [J].
ZUNG, WWK .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1965, 12 (01) :63-70