Measurement repeatability profiles of eight frequently requested measurands in clinical chemistry determined by duplicate measurements of patient samples

被引:7
作者
Kallner, Anders [1 ]
Petersmann, Astrid [2 ,3 ]
Nauck, Matthias [3 ]
Theodorsson, Elvar [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Med, Inst Klin Chem, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Med, Inst Clin Chem & Lab Med, Greifswald, Germany
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin Chem, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Dahlberg uncertainty; reproducibility; analysis of variance components; ANOVA; IMPRECISION PROFILES; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; QUALITY-CONTROL; SPECIFICATIONS; PRECISION; IMMUNOASSAY; VALIDATION; OUTLIERS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1080/00365513.2020.1716266
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Measurement uncertainties in clinical chemistry are commonly regarded as heteroscedastic - having a constant relative standard deviation irrespective of the concentration of the measurand. The uncertainty is usually determined at two concentrations using stabilized control materials and assumed to represent the analytical goal. The purpose of the present study was to use duplicates of unselected patient samples to calculate the absolute and relative repeatability component of the intra-laboratory measurement uncertainty from duplicates, using the Dahlberg formula and analysis of variance components. Estimates were made at five different concentration intervals of ALT, AST, Calcium, Cholesterol, Creatinine, CRP, Triglycerides and TSH covering the entire concentration interval of the patient cohort. This partioning allows detailing their repeatability profiles. The calculations of the profiles were based on randomly selected results from sets of duplicates ranging from 12,000 to 65,000 pairs. The repeatability of the measurands showed substantial variability within the measuring interval. Therefore, characterizing imprecision profiles as purely homo- or heteroscedastic or by a single number may not be optimal for the intended use. The present data make a case for nuancing the evaluation of analytical goals and minimal differences of measurement results by establishing uncertainty profiles under repeatability conditions, using natural patient samples.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 209
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, J LAB MED
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1994, 5725 ISODIS
  • [3] ARONSSON T, 1984, SCAND J CLIN LAB INV, V44, P51
  • [4] Estimating imprecision profiles in biochemical analysis
    Berweger, CD
    Müller-Plathe, F
    Hänseler, E
    Keller, H
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1998, 277 (02) : 107 - 125
  • [5] BIPM IEC IFCC ILAC ISO IUPAC, 2008, JCGM
  • [6] Bundesarztekammer, NEUF RICHTL BUND QUA
  • [7] Dahlberg G., 1940, STAT METHOD MEDICAL
  • [8] Ekins RP, 1983, IMMUNOASSAYS CLIN CH, P111
  • [9] Fraser CG, 1999, SCAND J CLIN LAB INV, V59, P477
  • [10] A practical guide to analytical method validation, including measurement uncertainty and accuracy profiles
    Gustavo Gonzalez, A.
    Angeles Herrador, M.
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 26 (03) : 227 - 238