Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent reacting flows with conjugate heat transfer and radiative heat transfer

被引:15
作者
Fureby, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Def Res Agcy FOI, Def Secur Syst Technol, SE-14725 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Turbulent combustion; LES; Conjugate heat-transfer; Thermal-radiation; Validation; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; COMBUSTION; HYDROCARBON; FLAMES; MIXTURES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.285
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is now an attractive and widely used model for predicting turbulent combustion that finds increasing use in studies of IC-engines, gas turbines, and dual-mode ramjet engines as well as in other applications. Several parameters, e.g. which subgrid turbulence model, reaction mechanism, and filtered reaction-rate model is used, determines the accuracy and robustness of the LES model, together with the choice of numerical methods and grids. Extensive studies are ongoing to further elucidate these issues, and to develop more accurate and robust models. However, most often are thermal-radiation and conjugate heat-transfer overlooked. This may be due to the challenges associated with the physics and modeling of thermal-radiation heat-transfer. Only a handful studies deal with this topic, suggesting that although the global effects in terms of power are small, the energy redistribution by thermal-radiation is important. Here, we apply finite-rate chemistry LES to a well-known bluff-body stabilized flame, for which experimental data is available to analyze the influence of thermal-radiation and conjugate heat-transfer on the flow/flame. Two thermal-radiation models, the P1 and fvDOM models, are used to examine the sensitivity of this modeling, and comparisons are made with experimental velocity, temperature and CO mass-fraction profiles, with and without conjugate heat-transfer. The results show that the LES results taking thermal-radiation and conjugate heat-transfer into account are in better agreement with the experimental data than the LES results not taking these effects into account. Also, the differences between the P1 and fvDOM models are small, but with the results using the fvDOM model in better agreement with the experimental data. The LES results are also used to elucidate the flow/flame physics, and the influence of thermal-radiation and conjugate heat-transfer that should not be overlooked in studies of turbulent combustion. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:3021 / 3029
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
17Sjunnesson A., 1991, VALIDATION RIG TOOL
[2]   A nonuniform narrow band correlated-k approximation using the k-moment method [J].
Andre, Frederic ;
Vaillon, Rodolphe .
JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2010, 111 (12-13) :1900-1911
[3]   Scalar profiles and NO formation in laminar opposed-flow partially premixed methane/air flames [J].
Barlow, RS ;
Karpetis, AN ;
Frank, JH ;
Chen, JY .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2001, 127 (03) :2102-2118
[4]   The laminar burning velocity of flames propagating in mixtures of hydrocarbons and air measured with the heat flux method [J].
Bosschaart, KJ ;
de Goey, LPH .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2004, 136 (03) :261-269
[5]   A parallel pressure implicit splitting of operators algorithm applied to flows at all speeds [J].
Bressloff, NW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2001, 36 (05) :497-518
[6]   Index of resolution quality for large eddy simulations [J].
Celik, IB ;
Cehreli, ZN ;
Yavuz, I .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (05) :949-958
[7]  
Chandrashekhar S., 1950, RAD TRANSFER
[8]  
Chemical-Kinetic Mechanisms for Combustion, 2012, APPL MECH AER ENG CO
[9]   Numerical simulation of the interaction between turbulence and radiation in reactive flows [J].
Coelho, P. J. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2007, 33 (04) :311-383
[10]   Measurements of Laminar Flame Velocity for Components of Natural Gas [J].
Dirrenberger, Patricia ;
Le Gall, Herve ;
Bounaceur, Roda ;
Herbinet, Olivier ;
Glaude, Pierre-Alexandre ;
Konnov, Alexander ;
Battin-Leclerc, Frederique .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2011, 25 (09) :3875-3884