Toward the validation of a new method (MUNIX) for motor unit number assessment

被引:14
|
作者
Stein, Franziska [1 ]
Kobor, Ines [1 ]
Bogdahn, Ulrich [1 ]
Schulte-Mattler, Wilhelm J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Neurol, Univ Str 84, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Motor unit number index; Motor unit number estimation; Spike-triggered averaging motor unit number estimation; Incremental stimulation motor unit number estimation; AMYOTROPHIC-LATERAL-SCLEROSIS; INDEX MUNIX; NEURON DISEASE; HUMAN MUSCLES; ALS PATIENTS; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.02.001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: This prospectively designed study analyzed the correlation of a new, non-invasive neurophysiological method (Motor Unit Number Index -MUNIX) with two established Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) methods. Methods: MUNIX and incremental stimulation MUNE (IS-MUNE) were done in the abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM), while MUNIX and spike-triggered averaging MUNE (STA-MUNE) were tested in the trapezius muscle. Twenty healthy subjects and 17 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were examined. Results: MUNIX and MUNE values correlated significantly (ADM: n = 108; Spearman-Rho; r = 0.88; p < 0.01; trapezius muscle: n = 49; Spearman-Rho; r = 0.46; p < 0.01). Discussion: MUNIX indeed reflects the number of motor units in a muscle, and may sensibly be recorded from the trapezius muscle. With MUNIX being both much more patient friendly and much more rapid to assess than MUNE, the results support the use of MUNIX when motor unit number assessment is desired. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 77
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMPROVING THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF MOTOR UNIT NUMBER INDEX
    Escorcio-Bezerra, Marcio Luiz
    Bulle Oliveira, Acary Souza
    De Oliveira Braga, Nadia Iandoli
    Manzano, Gilberto Mastrocola
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2017, 55 (05) : 635 - 638
  • [32] Motor unit number estimation, ALS and clinical trials
    Gooch, CL
    Harati, Y
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS, 2000, 1 (02): : 71 - 82
  • [33] MOTOR UNIT NUMBER ESTIMATION: A TECHNOLOGY AND LITERATURE REVIEW
    Gooch, Clifton L.
    Doherty, Timothy J.
    Chan, K. Ming
    Bromberg, Mark B.
    Lewis, Richard A.
    Stashuk, Dan W.
    Berger, Michael J.
    Andary, Michael T.
    Daube, Jasper R.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2014, 50 (06) : 884 - 893
  • [34] Assessment of the F wave technique for motor unit number estimation in normal dogs
    Togawa, G.
    Saito, M.
    Watanabe, R.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 234 : 30 - 35
  • [35] Modified motor unit number index: A simulation study of the first dorsal interosseous muscle
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Nandedkar, Sanjeev D.
    Zhou, Ping
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2016, 38 (02) : 115 - 120
  • [36] Reproducibility of motor unit number index and MScanFit motor unit number estimation across intrinsic hand muscles
    Higashihara, Mana
    Menon, Parvathi
    van den Bos, Mehdi
    Pavey, Nathan
    Vucic, Steve
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2020, 62 (02) : 192 - 200
  • [37] Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) detects motor neuron loss in pre-symptomatic muscles in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
    Neuwirth, Christoph
    Barkhaus, Paul E.
    Burkhardt, Christian
    Castro, Jose
    Czell, David
    de Carvalho, Mamede
    Nandedkar, Sanjeev
    Stalberg, Erik
    Weber, Markus
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (03) : 495 - 500
  • [38] Neurophysiological Methods for Motor Unit Number Estimation in Human Muscles
    Schulte-Mattler, W. J.
    KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2011, 42 (04) : 221 - 225
  • [39] Motor unit number estimation (MUNE): Where are we now?
    de Carvalho, Mamede
    Barkhaus, Paul E.
    Nandedkar, Sanjeev D.
    Swash, Michael
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 129 (08) : 1507 - 1516
  • [40] Size does matter: The influence of motor unit potential size on statistical motor unit number estimates in healthy subjects
    Blok, J. H.
    van Dijk, J. P.
    Drenthen, J.
    Maathuis, E. M.
    Stegeman, D. F.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (10) : 1772 - 1780