Debris Flow Assessment in the Gaizi-Bulunkou Section of Karakoram Highway

被引:11
作者
Jiang, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Su, Fenghuan [1 ,3 ]
Li, Yong [1 ]
Guo, Xiaojun [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xuemei [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Mt Hazards & Earth Surface Proc, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] CAS HEC, China Pakistan Joint Res Ctr Earth Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Excellence Tibetan Plateau Earth Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Earthquake Adm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
debris flow; hazard assessment; Karakoran highway; empirical model; flow-R; SUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYSIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MEDIUM-SCALE; MODELS; EARTHQUAKE; VALLEY;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2021.660579
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Highways frequently run through the flow and accumulation areas of debris flow gullies and thus are susceptible to debris flow hazards. Assessing debris flows along highways can provide references for highway planners and debris flow control, emergency management. However, the existing assessment methods mostly neglect the essential information of the flow paths and spreading areas of debris flows at the regional scale. Taking the Gaizi Village-Bulunkou Township Section (hereinafter referred to as "the Gaizi-Bulunkou Section") of the Karakoram highway as the study area, this research introduces a simple empirical model (the Flow-R model) and establishes a method for assessing the debris flow hazard level. The main processes include data collection, inventory of former events, calculating source areas and spreading probability, verification of the model, extraction of hazard assessment factors, and calculation of debris flow hazard levels. The results show that: 1) the accuracy, sensitivity, and positive predictive power of the Flow-R model in simulating the debris flow spreading probability of the study area were 81.87, 70.80 and 72.70%, respectively. The errors mainly occurred in the debris flow fans. 2) The calculation results make it possible to divide debris flow hazard levels into four levels. N5, N19, and N28 gullies had the highest hazard level during the study period. 3) In the Gaizi-Bulunkou Section of the Karakoram highway, during the study period, the highways with very high, high, medium, and low hazards were 4.33, 0.62, 1.41, and 1.68 km in length, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Debris flow run-out and landslide sediment delivery model tests [J].
Bathurst, JC ;
Burton, A ;
Ward, TJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (05) :410-419
[2]   Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management [J].
Beguería, S .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2006, 37 (03) :315-329
[3]   Debris flow hazard modelling on medium scale: Valtellina di Tirano, Italy [J].
Blahut, J. ;
Horton, P. ;
Sterlacchini, S. ;
Jaboyedoff, M. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 10 (11) :2379-2390
[4]   Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas [J].
Blahut, Jan ;
van Westen, Cees J. ;
Sterlacchini, Simone .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 119 (1-2) :36-51
[5]   The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides [J].
Corominas, J .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 33 (02) :260-271
[6]   Risk assessment of highways affected by debris flows in Wenchuan earthquake area [J].
Cui Peng ;
Xiang Ling-zhi ;
Zou Qiang .
JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2013, 10 (02) :173-189
[7]  
Dhital Megh Raj., 2015, Geology of the Nepal Himalaya, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02496-7
[8]   Building the Pamirs: The view from the underside [J].
Ducea, MN ;
Lutkov, V ;
Minaev, VT ;
Hacker, B ;
Ratschbacher, L ;
Luffi, P ;
Schwab, M ;
Gehrels, GE ;
McWilliams, M ;
Vervoort, J ;
Metcalf, J .
GEOLOGY, 2003, 31 (10) :849-852
[9]  
Fischer L., 2012, LANDSLIDES ENG SLOPE, P723
[10]  
Gamma P., 2000, DFWALK MURGANG SIMUL