Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer

被引:14
|
作者
De Bernardo, Maddalena [1 ]
Borrelli, Maria [2 ]
Cembalo, Giovanni [1 ]
Rosa, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med Surg & Dent, I-84081 Baronissi, Italy
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Ophthalmol, D-40204 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 10期
关键词
intraocular pressure; Icare PRO; standing position; sitting position; supine position; EPISCLERAL VENOUS-PRESSURE; BODY POSITION; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION; RISK-FACTOR; FLUCTUATION; PNEUMATONOMETER; DIFFERENCE; BLOOD; HEAD;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55100701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: It has been established that body position can play an important role in intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation. IOP has been previously shown to increase significantly when lying down, relative to sitting; this type of investigation has not been extensively reported for the standing (ST) position. Therefore, this study aims to look for eventual significant IOP changes while ST, sitting, and lying down. Materials and Methods: An Icare PRO was used to measure the IOP of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals, with age ranging from 21 to 55 years (mean 29.22 +/- 9.12 years), in sitting, supine and ST positions; IOP was measured again, 5 min after standing (ST-5m). Results: Mean IOP difference between sitting and ST position was 0.39 +/- 1.93 mmHg (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.74 mmHg) (p = 0.027); between sitting and ST-5m, it was -0.48 +/- 1.79 mmHg (95% CI: -0.8 to -0.16 mmHg) (p = 0.004); between the sitting and supine position, it was -1.16 +/- 1.9 mmHg (95% CI: -1.5 to -0.82 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between the supine and ST position, it was 1.55 +/- 2.04 mmHg (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.92 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between supine and ST-5m, it was 0.68 +/- 1.87 mmHg (95% CI: 0.34 to 1.02 mmHg) (p < 0.001); and between ST-5m and ST, it was 0.94 +/- 1.95 mmHg (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.29 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Mean axial eye length was 24.45 mm (95% CI: 24.22 to 24.69 mm), and mean central corneal thickness was 535.30 mu m (95% CI: 529.44 to 541.19 mu m). Conclusion: Increased IOP in the ST-5m position suggests that IOP measurements should be performed in this position too. The detection of higher IOP values in the ST-5m position than in the sitting one, may explain the presence of glaucoma damage or progression in apparently normal-tension or compensated patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement of intraocular pressure in clinically normal Turkish Shepherd Dogs with the rebound tonometer (TonoVet®) and the applanation tonometer (Tono-Pen Vet®)
    Kulualp, Kadri
    Yurdakul, Ibrahim
    Erol, Hanifi
    Atalan, Gultekin
    Kilic, Servet
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 74 (09): : 568 - 573
  • [22] Assessing the Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry
    Realini, Tony
    McMillan, Brian
    Gross, Ronald L.
    Devience, Eva
    Balasubramani, Goundappa K.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (08) : 629 - 633
  • [23] A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Popovich, KS
    Shields, MB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 1997, 6 (01) : 44 - 46
  • [24] Comparison of intraocular pressure in healthy brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic cats using the Icare® TONOVET Plus rebound tonometer
    Kerdchuchuen, Kamolchanok
    Samathayanon, Kingkarn
    Phientong, Pitchapa
    Chattraphirat, Suprapha
    Jaturakan, Orapun
    Tuntivanich, Nalinee
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 24 (05) : 484 - 490
  • [25] The Difference in Intraocular Pressure before and after Visual Field Test Measured by Rebound Tonometer
    Park, Joong Hyun
    Kim, Jin Young
    Lee, Eun Kyoung
    Lee, Hye Jin
    Jeong, Jin Ho
    Lee, Sang-Yoon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (01): : 78 - 85
  • [26] Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Rebound Tonometer for Deviated Angles and Positions in Human Eyes
    Takenaka, Joji
    Mochizuki, Hideki
    Kunihara, Eriko
    Tanaka, Junko
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2012, 37 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [27] Intraocular pressure measurement over soft contact lens by rebound tonometer: a comparative study
    Senay Asik Nacaroglu
    Emine Seker Un
    Mehmet Giray Ersoz
    Yelda Tasci
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, (03) : 540 - 543
  • [28] Intraocular pressure measurement over soft contact lens by rebound tonometer: a comparative study
    Nacaroglu, Senay Asik
    Un, Emine Seker
    Ersoz, Mehmet Giray
    Tasci, Yelda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 8 (03) : 540 - 543
  • [29] Clinical Use of a New Position-independent Rebound Tonometer
    Jablonski, Kerstin Stephanie
    Rosentreter, Andre
    Gaki, Stergiani
    Lappas, Alexandra
    Dietlein, Thomas Stefan
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (09) : 763 - 767
  • [30] Comparative study of measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with corneal opacity and normal cornea by Tonopen Avia, rebound tonometer (I-care), and noncontact tonometer
    Reddy, Sridhara
    Sharma, VijayK
    Moulick, Partha Sarathy
    Singh, Atul Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 22 (02) : 207 - 211