Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer

被引:14
|
作者
De Bernardo, Maddalena [1 ]
Borrelli, Maria [2 ]
Cembalo, Giovanni [1 ]
Rosa, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med Surg & Dent, I-84081 Baronissi, Italy
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Ophthalmol, D-40204 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 10期
关键词
intraocular pressure; Icare PRO; standing position; sitting position; supine position; EPISCLERAL VENOUS-PRESSURE; BODY POSITION; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION; RISK-FACTOR; FLUCTUATION; PNEUMATONOMETER; DIFFERENCE; BLOOD; HEAD;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55100701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: It has been established that body position can play an important role in intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation. IOP has been previously shown to increase significantly when lying down, relative to sitting; this type of investigation has not been extensively reported for the standing (ST) position. Therefore, this study aims to look for eventual significant IOP changes while ST, sitting, and lying down. Materials and Methods: An Icare PRO was used to measure the IOP of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals, with age ranging from 21 to 55 years (mean 29.22 +/- 9.12 years), in sitting, supine and ST positions; IOP was measured again, 5 min after standing (ST-5m). Results: Mean IOP difference between sitting and ST position was 0.39 +/- 1.93 mmHg (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.74 mmHg) (p = 0.027); between sitting and ST-5m, it was -0.48 +/- 1.79 mmHg (95% CI: -0.8 to -0.16 mmHg) (p = 0.004); between the sitting and supine position, it was -1.16 +/- 1.9 mmHg (95% CI: -1.5 to -0.82 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between the supine and ST position, it was 1.55 +/- 2.04 mmHg (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.92 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between supine and ST-5m, it was 0.68 +/- 1.87 mmHg (95% CI: 0.34 to 1.02 mmHg) (p < 0.001); and between ST-5m and ST, it was 0.94 +/- 1.95 mmHg (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.29 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Mean axial eye length was 24.45 mm (95% CI: 24.22 to 24.69 mm), and mean central corneal thickness was 535.30 mu m (95% CI: 529.44 to 541.19 mu m). Conclusion: Increased IOP in the ST-5m position suggests that IOP measurements should be performed in this position too. The detection of higher IOP values in the ST-5m position than in the sitting one, may explain the presence of glaucoma damage or progression in apparently normal-tension or compensated patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, Prone, and Supine Positions
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Cione, Ferdinando
    De Pascale, Ilaria
    Pagliarulo, Sergio
    Rosa, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [2] Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Abbinante, Giulia
    Borrelli, Maria
    Di Stasi, Margherita
    Cione, Ferdinando
    Rosa, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)
  • [3] Effect of Body Position on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Rebound Tonometer in Healthy Children
    Uzlu, Dilek
    Akyol, Nurettin
    Turk, Adem
    Gursoy, Nurcan
    Somuncu, Ahmet Mehmet
    Oruc, Yavuz
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 50 (05): : 271 - 274
  • [4] Evaluation of the Effect of Body Position on Intraocular Pressure Measured with Rebound Tonometer
    Mayali, Huseyin
    Tekin, Beyza
    Kayikcioglu, Ozcan Rasim
    Kurt, Emin
    Ilker, Suleyman Sami
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 49 (01): : 6 - 9
  • [5] The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet (R) rebound tonometer
    de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz
    Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano
    Williams, David L.
    OPEN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [6] Evaluation of Rebound Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure at Deviated Angle and Position
    Takenaka, Joji
    Mochizuki, Hideki
    Kunihara, Eriko
    Tanaka, Junko
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (05) : 422 - 428
  • [7] Rebound Tonometer: Ideal Tonometer for Measurement of Accurate Intraocular Pressure
    Suman, Suwarna
    Agrawal, Ajai
    Pal, Virendra K.
    Pratap, Vir B.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (09) : 633 - 637
  • [8] Evaluation of the ICare Rebound Tonometer as a Home Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Device
    Asrani, Sanjay
    Chatterjee, Ashmita
    Wallace, David K.
    Santiago-Turla, Cecilia
    Stinnett, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (02) : 74 - 79
  • [9] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions
    Lee, Tae-Eun
    Yoo, Chungkwon
    Hwang, Jin-Young
    Lin, Shan
    Kim, Yong Yeon
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2015, 40 (09) : 923 - 929
  • [10] Intraocular pressure measurements using the TONOVET(R) rebound tonometer: Influence of the probe-cornea distance
    Rodrigues, Blanche D.
    Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano
    Bortolini, Mariza
    Somma, Andre T.
    Komaromy, Andras M.
    Dornbusch, Peterson Triches
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 24 : 175 - 185