Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer

被引:14
作者
De Bernardo, Maddalena [1 ]
Borrelli, Maria [2 ]
Cembalo, Giovanni [1 ]
Rosa, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med Surg & Dent, I-84081 Baronissi, Italy
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Ophthalmol, D-40204 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 10期
关键词
intraocular pressure; Icare PRO; standing position; sitting position; supine position; EPISCLERAL VENOUS-PRESSURE; BODY POSITION; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION; RISK-FACTOR; FLUCTUATION; PNEUMATONOMETER; DIFFERENCE; BLOOD; HEAD;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55100701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: It has been established that body position can play an important role in intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation. IOP has been previously shown to increase significantly when lying down, relative to sitting; this type of investigation has not been extensively reported for the standing (ST) position. Therefore, this study aims to look for eventual significant IOP changes while ST, sitting, and lying down. Materials and Methods: An Icare PRO was used to measure the IOP of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals, with age ranging from 21 to 55 years (mean 29.22 +/- 9.12 years), in sitting, supine and ST positions; IOP was measured again, 5 min after standing (ST-5m). Results: Mean IOP difference between sitting and ST position was 0.39 +/- 1.93 mmHg (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.74 mmHg) (p = 0.027); between sitting and ST-5m, it was -0.48 +/- 1.79 mmHg (95% CI: -0.8 to -0.16 mmHg) (p = 0.004); between the sitting and supine position, it was -1.16 +/- 1.9 mmHg (95% CI: -1.5 to -0.82 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between the supine and ST position, it was 1.55 +/- 2.04 mmHg (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.92 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between supine and ST-5m, it was 0.68 +/- 1.87 mmHg (95% CI: 0.34 to 1.02 mmHg) (p < 0.001); and between ST-5m and ST, it was 0.94 +/- 1.95 mmHg (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.29 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Mean axial eye length was 24.45 mm (95% CI: 24.22 to 24.69 mm), and mean central corneal thickness was 535.30 mu m (95% CI: 529.44 to 541.19 mu m). Conclusion: Increased IOP in the ST-5m position suggests that IOP measurements should be performed in this position too. The detection of higher IOP values in the ST-5m position than in the sitting one, may explain the presence of glaucoma damage or progression in apparently normal-tension or compensated patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Asrani S, 2000, J GLAUCOMA, V9, P134
[2]   Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL [J].
Barkana, Yaniv ;
Gutfreund, Shay .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 42 (07) :608-614
[3]   Postural Change in Intraocular Pressure: A Comparison of Measurement With a Goldmann Tonometer, Tonopen XL, Pneumatonometer, and HA-2 [J].
Barkana, Yaniv .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (01) :E23-E28
[4]   Diurnal variation of episcleral venous pressure in healthy patients:: A pilot study [J].
Blondeau, P ;
Tétrault, JP ;
Papamarkakis, C .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2001, 10 (01) :18-24
[5]   Effect of Sleeping in a Head-Up Position on Intraocular Pressure in Patients with Glaucoma [J].
Buys, Yvonne M. ;
Alasbali, Tariq ;
Jin, Ya-Ping ;
Smith, Michael ;
Gouws, Pieter ;
Geffen, Noa ;
Flanagan, John G. ;
Shapiro, Colin M. ;
Trope, Graham E. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (07) :1348-1351
[6]   Intraocular pressure fluctuation - A risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study [J].
Caprioli, Joseph ;
Coleman, Anne L. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (07) :1123-1129
[7]   Intraocular pressure fluctuation - An independent risk factorfor glaucoma? [J].
Caprioli, Joseph .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 125 (08) :1124-1125
[8]  
Cowley AW., 1996, Primer on the Autonomic Nervous System, V1, P49
[9]   Axial Length Shortening After Cataract Surgery: New Approach to Solve the Question [J].
De Bernardo, Maddalena ;
Salerno, Giulio ;
Cornetta, Palmiro ;
Rosa, Nicola .
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (06)
[10]   Intraocular Pressure Evaluation after Myopic Refractive Surgery: A Comparison of Methods in 121 Eyes [J].
De Bernardo, Maddalena ;
Capasso, Luigi ;
Caliendo, Luisa ;
Vosa, Ylenia ;
Rosa, Nicola .
SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03) :233-242