Urban Inequality, Neoliberalism, and the Case for a Multidisciplinary Economics

被引:4
作者
Koechlin, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Vassar Coll, Int Studies Program, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604 USA
关键词
urban economics; inequality; U; S; cities; neoliberalism; P25; D3; B5;
D O I
10.1177/0486613414537978
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper begins by chronicling the stunning inequality (economic and other) that characterizes the U.S. economy and U.S. cities. The development of cities in the United States in recent decades is linked quite essentially to the dynamics and contradictions of U.S. capitalism, including a policy agenda that has been pro-capital and anti-urban. The penultimate section of the paper shows that neoclassical theory - with its focus on choice - provides a deeply inadequate explanation of urban inequality. And yet neoclassicism, along with its cruder relative, neoliberalism, has continued to shape the narrative of U.S. cities. The final section argues for a multidisciplinary economics that recognizes that a rich urban economics requires insights from political science, sociology, geography, and other academic disciplines.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 460
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Albelda Randy., 2002, LOST GROUND WELFARE
[2]  
Annie E., 2012, CHILD POVERTY RATES
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE NEW JIM CROW MAS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, REBEL CITIES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND T
[6]  
[Anonymous], WHEN WORK DISAPPEARS
[7]  
[Anonymous], THE PRICE OF INEQUAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPERS
[9]  
Atkinson A. B., 2011, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC, V49
[10]  
Bartels, 2008, UNEQUAL DEMOCRACY TH