Late anastomotic leaks in pancreas transplant recipients - clinical characteristics and predisposing factors

被引:34
作者
Nath, DS [1 ]
Gruessner, A [1 ]
Kandaswamy, R [1 ]
Gruessner, RW [1 ]
Sutherland, DER [1 ]
Humar, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
anastomotic leaks; pancreas transplants; surgical complications;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00322.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anastomotic leaks after pancreas transplants usually occur early in the postoperative course, but may also be seen late post-transplant. We studied such leaks to determine predisposing factors, methods of management, and outcomes. Results: Between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2002, a total of 25 pancreas transplant recipients at our institution experienced a late leak (defined as one occurring more than 3 months post-transplant). We excluded recipients with an early leak or with a leak seen immediately after an enteric conversion. The mean recipient age was 40.3 yr; mean donor age, 31.3 yr. The category of transplant was as follows: simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 5, 20%), pancreas after kidney (n = 10, 40%), and pancreas transplant alone (n = 10, 40%). At the time of their leak, most recipients (n = 23, 92%) had bladder-drained pancreas grafts; only two recipients (8%) had enteric-drained grafts. The mean time from transplant to the late leak was 20.5 months (range = 3.5-74 months). A direct predisposing event or risk factor occurring in the 6 wk preceding leak diagnosis was identified in 10 (40%) of the recipients. Such events or risk factors included a biopsy-proven episode of acute rejection (n = 4, 16%), a history of blunt abdominal trauma (n = 3, 12%), a recent episode of cytomegalovirus infection (n = 2, 8%), and obstructive uropathy from acute prostatitis (n = 1, 4%). Non-operative or conservative care (Foley catheter placement with or without percutaneous abdominal drains) was the initial treatment in 14 (56%) of the recipients. Such care was successful in nine (64%) of the 14 recipients; the other five (36%) required surgical repair after failure of conservative care at a mean of 10 d after Foley catheter placement. Of the 25 recipients, 11 underwent surgery as their initial leak treatment: repair in nine and pancreatectomy because of severe peritonitis in two. After appropriate management (conservative or operative) of the initial leak, five (20%) of the 25 recipients had a recurrent leak; the mean length of time from initial leak to recurrent leak was 5.6 months. All five recipients with a recurrent leak ultimately required surgery. Conclusions: Late anastomotic leaks are not uncommon; they may be more common with bladder-drained grafts. One-third of the recipients with a late leak had experienced some obvious preceding event that predisposed to the leak. For two-thirds of our stable recipients with bladder-drained grafts, non-operative treatment of the leak was successful.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   DIAGNOSIS OF DUODENAL LEAKS FROM KIDNEY-PANCREAS TRANSPLANTS IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENOVESICAL ANASTOMOSES - VALUE OF CT CYSTOGRAPHY [J].
BISCHOF, TP ;
THOENI, RF ;
MELZER, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (02) :349-354
[2]   Comparison of enteric versus bladder drainage in pancreas transplantation [J].
Corry, RJ ;
Chakrabarti, P ;
Shapiro, R ;
Jordan, ML ;
Scantlebury, VP ;
Vivas, CA .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) :1647-1651
[3]   Duodenal complications in bladder-drained pancreas transplantation [J].
Hakim, NS ;
Gruessner, AC ;
Papalois, BE ;
Troppmann, C ;
Dunn, DL ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Gruessner, RWG .
SURGERY, 1997, 121 (06) :618-624
[4]   Pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage:: Duodenal segment leak [J].
Heredia, EN ;
Ricart, J ;
Astudillo, E ;
Lopez-Boado, M ;
Delgado, S ;
Amador, A ;
Perez, M ;
Esmatjes, E ;
Fernández-Cruz, L .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (01) :215-215
[5]   Prolonged preservation increases surgical complications after pancreas transplants [J].
Humar, A ;
Kandaswamy, R ;
Drangstveit, MB ;
Parr, E ;
Gruessner, AG ;
Sutherland, DER .
SURGERY, 2000, 127 (05) :545-551
[6]   Chronic rejection: The next major challenge for pancreas transplant recipients [J].
Humar, A ;
Khwaja, K ;
Ramcharan, T ;
Asolati, M ;
Kandaswamy, R ;
Gruessner, RWG ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Gruessner, AC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (06) :918-923
[7]  
ILLINER WE, 1987, TRANSPLANT P, V19, P2323
[8]  
Rayhill SC, 1995, TRANSPLANT P, V27, P3141
[9]  
SECCHI A, 1992, TRANSPLANT INT, V5, P210
[10]  
Troppmann C, 1995, TRANSPLANT P, V27, P3101