Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:8
作者
Takeshima, Yuta [1 ]
Yamada, Yuta [2 ]
Teshima, Taro [2 ]
Fujimura, Tetsuya [3 ]
Kakutani, Shigenori [4 ]
Hakozaki, Yuji [2 ]
Kimura, Naoki [2 ]
Akiyama, Yoshiyuki [2 ]
Sato, Yusuke [2 ]
Kawai, Taketo [2 ]
Yamada, Daisuke [2 ]
Kume, Haruki [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Med Sci, Adv Clin Res Ctr,Div Innovat Canc Therapy, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Bunkyo Ku, Hongo 7-3-1, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[4] Chiba Tokushukai Hosp, Dept Urol, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Pathological upgrading; Biochemical recurrence; GLEASON SCORE; BIOPSY; VALIDATION; TRENDS; TESTOSTERONE; PREDICTORS; PATTERNS; OBESITY; SYSTEM; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-021-08248-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical significance and risk factors of upgrading in the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group System in men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. Methods A total of 583 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by systematic biopsy were treated with RARP without neoadjuvant therapy from November 2011 to December 2018. Clinicopathological data were obtained from our clinical records. ISUP grade upgrading (IGU) was defined as 'ISUP grade in prostatectomy specimen determined to be higher than that in the biopsy specimen'. Clinicopathological factors, including age, PSA, prostate volume at biopsy (PV), PSA density, clinical stage, body mass index (BMI), interval from biopsy to prostatectomy, maximum percentage of cancer involvement per core (%CI), total number of biopsy cores, percentage of cancer positive biopsy cores (%PC), and sampling density were analyzed to detect potential risk factors of IGU. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates were calculated to analyze the effect of IGU on cancer prognosis. Results In univariate analysis, BMI was a positive predictor of IGU, while %CI, %PC, and sampling density were negative predictors of IGU. BMI and %PC were statistically significant predictors of IGU in multivariate analysis. For cases diagnosed as ISUP grade group 2 or higher at biopsy, there was a significant difference in BCR rates between cases with and without IGU. Conclusions The results from our cohort showed that elements of both high-grade cancer risk (such as BMI) and sampling efficiency (such as %PC) contribute to IGU. Excluding cases diagnosed as ISUP grade group 1 at biopsy, BCR-free rates were significantly worse in cases with IGU, highlighting the need for more accurate pathological diagnosis at biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Obesity and Prostate Cancer: Weighing the Evidence
    Allott, Emma H.
    Masko, Elizabeth M.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (05) : 800 - 809
  • [2] The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy
    Arsov, Christian
    Becker, Nikolaus
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Hiester, Andreas
    Quentin, Michael
    Dietzel, Frederic
    Antoch, Gerald
    Gabbert, Helmut E.
    Albers, Peter
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 141 (11) : 2061 - 2068
  • [3] Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome
    Berney, Daniel M.
    Beltran, Luis
    Fisher, Gabrielle
    North, Bernard V.
    Greenberg, David
    Moller, Henrik
    Soosay, Geraldine
    Scardino, Peter
    Cuzick, Jack
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (10) : 1078 - 1083
  • [4] Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer treated with surgery in the United Kingdom: trends and risk factors from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Radical Prostatectomy Registry
    Bullock, Nicholas
    Simpkin, Andrew
    Fowler, Sarah
    Varma, Murali
    Kynaston, Howard
    Narahari, Krishna
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [5] Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: Histopathological correlation to matched prostatectomy specimens
    Cam, K
    Yucel, S
    Turkeri, L
    Akdas, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 9 (05) : 257 - 260
  • [6] Development and external validation of an extended repeat biopsy nomogram
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Graefen, Markus
    Porter, Christopher
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Haese, Alexander
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Borden, Lester
    Steuber, Thomas
    Salonia, Andrea
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Latchemsetty, Kalyan
    Walz, Jochen
    Kim, Jason
    Eichelberg, Christian
    Currlin, Eike
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    Valiquette, Luc
    Heinzer, Hans
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (02) : 510 - 515
  • [7] Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence
    Corcoran, Niall M.
    Hong, Matthew K. H.
    Casey, Rowan G.
    Hurtado-Coll, Antonio
    Peters, Justin
    Harewood, Laurence
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Hovens, Chris M.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) : E202 - E210
  • [8] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [9] Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Davies, Judson D.
    Aghazadeh, Monty A.
    Phillips, Sharon
    Salem, Shady
    Chang, Sam S.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Penson, David F.
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) : 2221 - 2227
  • [10] Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy
    De Luca, Stefano
    Fiori, Cristian
    Bollito, Enrico
    Garrou, Diletta
    Aimar, Roberta
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Tota, Daniele
    Federica, Massa
    Passera, Roberto
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (03) : 360 - 368