Intrathoracic hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in prone position during totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

被引:6
作者
Charalabopoulos, Alexandros [1 ,2 ]
Davakis, Spyridon [1 ,2 ]
Syllaios, Athanasios [2 ]
Lorenzi, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Broomfield Hosp, Reg Oesophagogastr Canc Ctr, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Chelmsford, Essex, England
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Laiko Gen Hosp, Dept Surg 1, Upper Gastrointestinal & Gen Surg Unit, Athens, Greece
关键词
esophageal cancer; esophagogastric anastomosis; hand-sewn; intrathoracic; thoracoscopic; totally minimally invasive esophagectomy; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/dote/doaa106
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Utilization of totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer is on the rise. Esophagogastric anastomosis is mechanically or robotically performed routinely; little report exists of hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis. This is the largest so far study with thoracoscopic hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis during fully minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in prone position. Consecutive two-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomies for cancer were performed by one surgical team, from September 2016 to March 2019. All operations were technically identical in terms of patient positioning, surgical approach, extend of lymphadenectomy and type of anastomosis formed. Primary end points were anastomotic leak and anastomotic stricture rate, while secondary end points were 30-day and 90-day mortality rates. From the overall n = 80 patients, n = 67 were males, while n = 13 were females. Mean age was 64.6 years. Mean length of stay was n = 14 days. There were no conversions to open. Mean operating time was 420 minutes with no blood loss over 200 mL noted. Pulmonary and cardiac complication rate was 23.75% and 2.5%, respectively. Anastomotic leak rate was 2.5%. Anastomotic strictures were seen in 12.5% of cases. 30-day and 90-day mortality rate was 2.5% and 5%, respectively, with none accounted for ischemic conduit complications. Intrathoracic anastomosis in totally minimally invasive esophagectomy is challenging and accountable for most of the mortality associated with the procedure. In thoracoscopic two-stage esophagectomy, a mechanical anastomosis is usually preferred; this is believed to be due to the complexity of manual anastomosis associated with the thoracoscopic approach. We aim to present our series of completely hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis utilizing a totally minimally invasive approach with favorable outcomes. With this study, reproducibility of the anastomosis is shown that can potentially favor a change in the practice of esophageal surgeons worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Biere, Surya S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Maas, Kirsten W.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Rosman, Camiel
    Roig Garcia, Josep
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    de lange, Elly S. M.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) : 1887 - 1892
  • [2] Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis
    Cerfolio, Robert James
    Bryant, Ayesha S.
    Hawn, Mary T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [3] Role of 3D in minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Kordzadeh, Ali
    Tang, Cheuk-Bong
    Kadirkamanathan, Sritharan
    Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (03) : 555 - 561
  • [4] Cuschieri A, 1992, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V37, P7
  • [5] Hybrid Minimally-invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Clinical and Oncological Outcomes
    Davakis, Spyridon
    Syllaios, Athanasios
    Sdralis, Elias
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (03) : 1753 - 1758
  • [6] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) improves perioperative outcomes: a review
    Kingina, B. Feike
    de Maat, Michiel E. G.
    van der Horst, Sylvia
    van der Sluis, Pieter C.
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 : S735 - S742
  • [7] Over-the-scope-clip treatment of gastrobronchial fistula following minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a novel approach
    Kordzadeh, Ali
    Syllaios, Athanasios
    Davakis, Spyridon
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Jayanthi, Naga V.
    Tang, Cheuk-Bong
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2019, (08):
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Circumferential Hiatal Dissection for the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus and Esophago-gastric Junction: Technical Considerations Combined With Histopathological Outcomes
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Davakis, Spyridon
    Syllaios, Athanasios
    Kordzadeh, Ali
    Kadri, Moina
    Ram, Manisha
    Fareed, Khaleel
    Barter, Charlotte
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (06) : 3219 - 3225
  • [10] International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)
    Low, Donald E.
    Alderson, Derek
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    D'Journo, Xavier Benoit
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    Law, Simon Ying Kit
    Lerut, Toni E.
    Maynard, Nick
    Pera, Manuel
    Peters, Jeffrey H.
    Pramesh, C. S.
    Reynolds, John V.
    Smithers, B. Mark
    van Lanschot, J. Jan B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 286 - 294