Comparison between current and future environmental satellite imagers on cloud classification using MODIS

被引:25
作者
Li, Zhenglong
Li, Jun
Menzel, W. Paul
Schmit, Timothy J.
Ackerman, Steven A.
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Cooperat Inst Meteorol Satellite Studies, CIMSS, SSEC, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] NOAA, Ctr Satellite Applicat & Res, NESDIA, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
MODIS; cloud classification; cloud detection; ABI; VIIRS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Future Satellite Imagers are expected to improve current ones on environmental and meteorological applications. In this study, an automatic classification scheme using radiance measurements with a clustering method is applied in an attempt to compare the capability on cloud classification by different sensors: AVHRR/3, the current GOES-12 Imager, SEVIRI, VIIRS, and ABI. The MODIS cloud mask is used as the initial classification. The results are analyzed with the help of true color and RGB composite images as well as other information about surface and cloud types. Results indicate that the future sensors (ABI and VIIRS) provide much better overall cloud classification capabilities than their corresponding current sensors (the current GOES-12 Imager and AVHRR/3) from the two chosen demonstration cases. However, for a specific class, it is not always true that more spectral bands result in better classification. In order to optimally use the spectral information, it is necessary to determine which bands are more sensitive for a specific class. Spatial resolution and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of satellite sensors can significantly affect the classification. The 2.13 mu m band could be useful for thin low cloud detection and the 3.7 mu m band is useful for fresh snow detection. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 326
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS [J].
Ackerman, SA ;
Strabala, KI ;
Menzel, WP ;
Frey, RA ;
Moeller, CC ;
Gumley, LE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D24) :32141-32157
[2]  
ALLEN RC, 1990, J APPL METEOROL, V29, P994, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Baum BA, 1997, J APPL METEOROL, V36, P1519, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1519:ACCOGA>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   CLOUD COVER FROM HIGH-RESOLUTION SCANNER DATA - DETECTING AND ALLOWING FOR PARTIALLY FILLED FIELDS OF VIEW [J].
COAKLEY, JA ;
BRETHERTON, FP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1982, 87 (NC7) :4917-4932
[7]   A comparison of cloud top heights computed from airborne lidar and MAS radiance data using CO2 slicing [J].
Frey, RA ;
Baum, BA ;
Menzel, WP ;
Ackerman, SA ;
Moeller, CC ;
Spinhirne, JD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D20) :24547-24555
[8]  
GURKA JJ, 2001, 5 S INT OBS SYST ALB
[9]   MODIS snow-cover products [J].
Hall, DK ;
Riggs, GA ;
Salomonson, VV ;
DiGirolamo, NE ;
Bayr, KJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 83 (1-2) :181-194
[10]  
HOBBS PV, 1981, CLOUDS THEIR FORMATI