Biomechanical evaluation of external ankle arthrodesis contact area and pressure distribution

被引:0
|
作者
Connor, CJ [1 ]
Nabhani, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teesside, Sch Sci & Technol, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
关键词
biomechanics; ankle; arthrodesis; contact;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.140
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The ankle is a joint that is often adversely affected by arthritis. This results in a painful and stiff joint. Ankle replacement is only suitable in certain situations, and so the surgical technique of choice is often arthrodesis, where the two bones are fused together to remove the joint. Key factors that affect the successful outcome of such procedures are the levels of contact and pressure across the joint during the arthrodesis compression period. This study evaluates the difference in contact area and pressures that can be expected during an external arthrodesis procedure. Comparisons are obtained for different shaped joint surfaces, namely flat or curved, and compression pin placement, namely central to the talar dome or anterior. The effect of the Achilles tendon upon this structure is also considered. The mechanical stability of these constructs was then evaluated resulting in load/deflection curves for the different situations. Contact areas and pressures were measured by installing models representing the ankle joint into a test rig specifically designed for the purpose. Pressure sensitive film was used to measure the pressure across the joint, whilst measured loads were applied using compression pins through the talar model to achieve compression. Loads were then applied to these models to simulate motion forces at the ankle, and the resulting deflections recorded. Results indicate that there is little difference in terms of joint contact area and pressure between curved and flat cut scenarios. An anterior talar pin position does, however give the best contact area for both flat and curved shapes. Mechanical stability was also influenced by pin position, with anterior pins giving the optimum resistance to motion when combined with an Achilles tendon load. Curved joint shapes gave a marked improvement in stability when tested for rotation, previously identified as the weakest and most important micromotion at the arthrodesis site. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 178
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF THE IMMEDIATE STABILITY OF 3 FIXATION DEVICES IN ANKLE ARTHRODESIS
    PILETTE, S
    HUK, OL
    YAHIA, L
    FOWLES, JV
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1993, 47 (09): : 905 - 911
  • [2] External Ring Fixation Versus Screw Fixation for Ankle Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Comparison
    Ogut, Tahir
    Glisson, Richard R.
    Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit
    Le, Ian L. D.
    Easley, Mark E.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (04) : 353 - 360
  • [3] A Biomechanical Analysis of Two Anterior Ankle Arthrodesis Systems
    Kestner, Christopher J.
    Glisson, Richard R.
    Nunley, James A., II
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 34 (07) : 1006 - 1011
  • [4] Ankle Arthrodesis Using Ring External Fixation
    Easley, Mark
    Looney, Colin
    Wellman, Samuel
    Wilson, Joseph
    TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2006, 5 (03): : 150 - 163
  • [5] Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis With Bimalleolar External Fixation
    Wood, Jennifer
    James, William
    Santrock, Robert
    TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2010, 9 (03): : 142 - 146
  • [6] A biomechanical study comparing the compression force and osseous area of contact of two screws fixation techniques used in ankle joint arthrodesis model
    Weigert, Annabelle
    Kistler, Manuel
    Bauer, Leandra
    Kussmaul, Adrian C.
    Keppler, Alexander M.
    Holzapfel, Boris Michael
    Wegener, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [7] Biomechanical evaluation of a second generation headless compression screw for ankle arthrodesis in a cadaver model
    Somberg, Andrew Max
    Whiteside, William K.
    Nilssen, Erik
    Murawski, Daniel
    Liu, Wei
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [8] Intraosseous device for arthrodesis in foot and ankle surgery: Review of the literature and biomechanical properties
    Benjamin, Biju
    Ryan, Paul
    Chechelnitskaya, Yulia
    Bayam, Levent
    Syed, Turab
    Drampalos, Efstathios
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 12 (12): : 1036 - 1045
  • [9] TECHNIQUE AND CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF ARTHROSCOPIC ANKLE ARTHRODESIS
    CORSO, SJ
    ZIMMER, TJ
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (05): : 585 - 590
  • [10] Biomechanical Comparison of External Fixation and Compression Screws for Transverse Tarsal Joint Arthrodesis
    Latt, L. Daniel
    Glisson, Richard R.
    Adams, Samuel B., Jr.
    Schuh, Reinhard
    Narron, John A.
    Easley, Mark E.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 36 (10) : 1235 - 1242