Fentanyl vs dexmedetomidine nebulization as adjuvant to lignocaine: A comparative study during awake flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy

被引:5
|
作者
Kumari, Poonam [1 ]
Kumar, Amarjeet [2 ]
Sinha, Chandni [1 ]
Kumar, Ajeet [1 ]
Rai, Deependra Kumar [3 ]
Kumar, Rajesh [1 ]
机构
[1] AIIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[2] AIIMS, Dept Trauma & Emergency, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] AIIMS, Dept Pulm Med, Patna, Bihar, India
关键词
Bronchoscopies; Nebulizer; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; Lignocaine; ALPHA(2)-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE; PREMEDICATION; COMBINATION; INTUBATION; SEDATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tacc.2020.09.009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy is used to diagnose diseases of the tracheobronchial tree and to obtain samples. Methods used for awake flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) to anaesthetize the airway include local anaesthetic nebulization, gargles, lozenges, sprays, and airway blocks. The aim is to compare the effect of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine nebulization as an adjuvant to lignocaine during awake FFB. Methods: Ninety patients were recruited and were randomized into 3 groups. Group I Patients were nebulised with a mixture of 4% lignocaine 4 ml and fentanyl 2 mg/kg, Group II with a mixture of 4% lignocaine 4 ml and dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg, and Group III with 4% lignocaine 4 ml and saline. Results: Cough score was lower in Group II (1.6 +/- 0.67) than Group I (2.5 +/- 0.68) and Group III (2.7 +/- 0.59). This difference between Group II and the rest of the group was highly significant (P < 0.001). Patients of Group II also had better satisfaction scores (1.40 +/- 0.56) when compared to Group I (1.90 +/- 0.71) and Group III (2.43 +/- 0.57). Patients in Group II were more comfortable (1.23 +/- 0.43) than Group I (1.63 +/- 0.49) and Group III (1.87 +/- 0.34) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lignocaine nebulization provides a better condition for bronchoscopy than fentanyl or lignocaine alone. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 22
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Comparison of midazolam with fentanyl-midazolam combination during flexible bronchoscopy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Prabhudev, Amithash Marulaiah
    Chogtu, Bharti
    Magazine, Rahul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 304 - 311
  • [32] Flexible nasal bronchoscopy vs. Airtraq® videolaryngoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a randomised controlled non-inferiority study
    Kamga, H.
    Frugier, A.
    Boutros, M.
    Bourges, J.
    Doublet, T.
    Parienti, J. J.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 (08) : 963 - 969
  • [33] Comparative evaluation of nebulised dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study
    Kumar, Amarjeet
    Sinha, Chandni
    Singh, Kunal
    Anant, Monika
    Kumar, Ajeet
    Kumari, Poonam
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [34] A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
    Bergese, Sergio D.
    Candiotti, Keith A.
    Bokesch, Paula M.
    Zura, Andrew
    Wisemandle, Wayne
    Bekker, Alex Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 17 (06) : 586 - 595
  • [35] A COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY OF INTRATHECAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE 5 mu g AND INTRATHECAL FENTANYL 25 mu g AS AN ADJUVANT WITH 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 12.5 mg IN ELECTIVE LOWER LIMB SURGERIES
    Shashikala, Thuraganur Kapanigowda
    Sanjeev, Kakaraddi
    Prathibha, Gowda Ashwathappa
    Kavya, Madhystha
    Naveen, Honakeri
    Srinivas, Velagalaburre Yalappa
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (49): : 3255 - 3261