Fentanyl vs dexmedetomidine nebulization as adjuvant to lignocaine: A comparative study during awake flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy

被引:5
作者
Kumari, Poonam [1 ]
Kumar, Amarjeet [2 ]
Sinha, Chandni [1 ]
Kumar, Ajeet [1 ]
Rai, Deependra Kumar [3 ]
Kumar, Rajesh [1 ]
机构
[1] AIIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[2] AIIMS, Dept Trauma & Emergency, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] AIIMS, Dept Pulm Med, Patna, Bihar, India
关键词
Bronchoscopies; Nebulizer; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; Lignocaine; ALPHA(2)-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE; PREMEDICATION; COMBINATION; INTUBATION; SEDATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tacc.2020.09.009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy is used to diagnose diseases of the tracheobronchial tree and to obtain samples. Methods used for awake flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) to anaesthetize the airway include local anaesthetic nebulization, gargles, lozenges, sprays, and airway blocks. The aim is to compare the effect of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine nebulization as an adjuvant to lignocaine during awake FFB. Methods: Ninety patients were recruited and were randomized into 3 groups. Group I Patients were nebulised with a mixture of 4% lignocaine 4 ml and fentanyl 2 mg/kg, Group II with a mixture of 4% lignocaine 4 ml and dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg, and Group III with 4% lignocaine 4 ml and saline. Results: Cough score was lower in Group II (1.6 +/- 0.67) than Group I (2.5 +/- 0.68) and Group III (2.7 +/- 0.59). This difference between Group II and the rest of the group was highly significant (P < 0.001). Patients of Group II also had better satisfaction scores (1.40 +/- 0.56) when compared to Group I (1.90 +/- 0.71) and Group III (2.43 +/- 0.57). Patients in Group II were more comfortable (1.23 +/- 0.43) than Group I (1.63 +/- 0.49) and Group III (1.87 +/- 0.34) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lignocaine nebulization provides a better condition for bronchoscopy than fentanyl or lignocaine alone. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 22
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy [J].
Abdel-Ghaffar, H. S. ;
Kamal, S. M. ;
El Sheriff, F. A. ;
Mohamed, S. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (02) :445-452
[2]   Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects [J].
Anttila, M ;
Penttilä, J ;
Helminen, A ;
Vuorilehto, L ;
Scheinin, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06) :691-693
[3]  
Barash PG., 2006, CLIN ANESTH, V5th, P621
[4]   Nebulized fentanyl for relief of abdominal pain [J].
Bartfield, JM ;
Flint, RD ;
McErlean, M ;
Broderick, J .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (03) :215-218
[5]   Anaesthesia for bronchoscopy [J].
Chadha, Meenu ;
Kulshrestha, Mayank ;
Biyani, Alok .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 59 (09) :565-573
[6]   British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE [J].
Du Rand, I. A. ;
Blaikley, J. ;
Booton, R. ;
Chaudhuri, N. ;
Gupta, V. ;
Khalid, S. ;
Mandal, S. ;
Martin, J. ;
Mills, J. ;
Navani, N. ;
Rahman, N. M. ;
Wrightson, J. M. ;
Munavvar, M. .
THORAX, 2013, 68 :1-44
[7]   Should patients undergoing a bronchoscopy be sedated? [J].
Gonzalez, R ;
De-La-Rosa-Ramirez, I ;
Maldonado-Hernandez, A ;
Dominguez-Cherit, G .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (04) :411-415
[8]   Effects of the α2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine on bronchoconstriction in dogs [J].
Groeben, H ;
Mitzner, W ;
Brown, RH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (02) :359-363
[9]   Nebulized dexmedetomidine-lidocaine inhalation as a premedication for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized trial [J].
Gu, Wei ;
Xu, Meiying ;
Lu, Huijie ;
Huang, Qi ;
Wu, Jingxiang .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (11) :4663-4670
[10]   Sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: current and emerging evidence [J].
Jose, Ricardo J. ;
Shaefi, Shahzad ;
Navani, Neal .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2013, 22 (128) :106-116