Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health qualy score in foot and ankle surgery

被引:37
作者
Malviya, Ajay
Makwana, Nilesh
Laing, Patrick
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] RJ & AH Orthopaed Hosp, Oswestry & Wrexham Maelor Hosp, Wrexham, Wales
关键词
AOFAS and QUALY scores; foot and ankle scores;
D O I
10.3113/FAI.2007.0494
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) is one scoring system used to assess and monitor the progress of patients after foot and ankle surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend of the AOFAS score over a period of time and correlate it with the QUALY score, which is a valid and reliable scoring system. Methods: All patients undergoing surgery by one foot and ankle surgeon between January, 2001, and July, 2003, were reviewed. The preoperative AOFAS and QUALY and postoperative scores at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly were collected prospectively. Results: This study includes 204 operative procedures in 159 patients. The mean age of the patients was 51.9 (range 12 to 89) years. The AOFAS scores increased from a mean of 45.5 preoperatively to 76.5 at 3 months and reached a peak of 81.5 at 6 months and then started to decrease to 79.2 at 12 months. This fall, though seemingly marginal, was significant (p < 0.01). This trend seems to be consistent for all the procedures. The 6-month AOFAS score was found to have a higher correlation with the final QUALY score (r(2) = 0.423) than the 12-month AOFAS score (r(2) = 0.326). Conclusions: The AOFAS score has low levels of correlation with the validated generic health QUALY score. Our study suggests that scores collected preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and annually there after may be best. The 3-month score may not be necessary. We recommend that a generic health score such as the QUALY score be used in conjunction with the AOFAS score to reflect outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 498
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - A MEASURE OF FOOT PAIN AND DISABILITY [J].
BUDIMANMAK, E ;
CONRAD, KJ ;
ROACH, KE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (06) :561-570
[2]   A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: Is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? [J].
Button, G ;
Pinney, S .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 25 (08) :521-525
[3]   Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: An analysis using Monte Carlo modeling [J].
Guyton, GP .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 22 (10) :779-787
[4]   CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS FOR THE ANKLE-HINDFOOT, MIDFOOT, HALLUX, AND LESSER TOES [J].
KITAOKA, HB ;
ALEXANDER, IJ ;
ADELAAR, RS ;
NUNLEY, JA ;
MYERSON, MS ;
SANDERS, M .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (07) :349-353
[5]  
Nyska M, 2001, Foot Ankle Clin, V6, P399, DOI 10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00104-9
[6]   The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery [J].
Parker, J ;
Nester, CJ ;
Long, AF ;
Barrie, J .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 24 (01) :56-60
[7]  
PYNSENT P, 1993, FOOT ANKLE, P246
[8]  
Radford PJ, 1993, OUTCOME MEASURES ORT, P59
[9]   SCALE OF VALUATIONS OF STATES OF ILLNESS - IS THERE A SOCIAL CONSENSUS [J].
ROSSER, R ;
KIND, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 7 (04) :347-358
[10]   Scoring in forefoot surgery - A statistical evaluation of single variables and rating systems [J].
Schneider, W ;
Knahr, K .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 69 (05) :498-504