Assessment of watershed health, vulnerability and resilience for determining protection and restoration Priorities

被引:48
作者
Ahn, So-Ra [1 ]
Kim, Seong-Joon [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res Ctr Paso, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
[2] Konkuk Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Syst Engn, Seoul 05029, South Korea
关键词
Watershed health; SWAT; Vulnerability; Resilience; Protection and restoration priorities; CRITICAL SOURCE AREAS; LAND-USE CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GROUNDWATER RECHARGE; MANAGEMENT AREAS; CHANGE SCENARIOS; RIVER-BASIN; IMPACTS; MODEL; PHOSPHORUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.014
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The watershed health, vulnerability and recovery potential for determining protection and restoration priorities were assessed for the Han River basin (34,148 km(2)) in South Korea. Six components, including the watershed landscape, stream geomorphology, hydrology, water quality, aquatic habitat conditions, and biological conditions, were used to evaluate the watershed health (basin natural capacity). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was utilized to examine the hydrology and water quality components in the study basin, which includes 237 sub-watersheds, three multipurpose dams, one hydroelectric dam, and three multifunction weirs. Four components, namely, the future impervious area, future climate conditions, future water use, and recent land cover changes were used to evaluate the watershed vulnerability to artificial stressors. We determined the protection and restoration priorities by evaluating and comparing the health and vulnerability of each sub-watershed. Sixty-seven subwatersheds out of 237 were classified to have restoration priorities with high recovery potentials. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Resilience-Vulnerability Analysis: A Decision-Making Framework for Systems Assessment [J].
Skondras, Nikolaos A. ;
Tsesmelis, Demetrios E. ;
Vasilakou, Constantina G. ;
Karavitis, Christos A. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) :1-14
[42]   Analysis Vulnerability Irrigation System Using Resilience Index in Irrigation Areas of Brantas Watershed [J].
Lestari, Wahyuni Setyo ;
Suprayogo, Didik ;
Prijono, Sugeng .
AGRITECH, 2018, 38 (04) :413-423
[43]   An atmospheric vulnerability assessment framework for environment management and protection based on CAMx [J].
Zhang, Yang ;
Shen, Jing ;
Li, Yu .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 207 :341-354
[44]   Assessment of Stream Restoration for Reduction of Sediment in a Large Agricultural Watershed [J].
Lenhart, Christian F. ;
Smith, David J. ;
Lewandowski, Ann ;
Belmont, Patrick ;
Gunderson, Larry ;
Nieber, John L. .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 144 (07)
[45]   Assessment of groundwater vulnerability mapping using AHP method in coastal watershed of shrimp farming area [J].
Gangadharan, R. ;
Rekha, Nila P. ;
Vinoth, S. .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 9 (02) :1-14
[46]   Modeling the overhead line vulnerability to combined wind and snow loads for resilience assessment studies [J].
Ciapessoni, E. ;
Cirio, D. ;
Pirovano, G. ;
Pitto, A. ;
Marzullo, F. ;
Lazzarini, A. ;
Falorni, F. ;
Scavo, F. .
2021 IEEE MADRID POWERTECH, 2021,
[47]   Prioritization-based management of the watershed using health assessment analysis at sub-watershed scale [J].
Gatgash, Zahra Ebrahimi ;
Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (09) :9673-9702
[48]   Vulnerability optimization for determining water restoration strategies in industrial park water networks [J].
Zhang, Yanmei ;
Wang, Chenxuan ;
Dou, Jianghai ;
Li, Zhiwei ;
Zhang, Peidong ;
Tan, Raymond R. ;
Wang, Fang ;
Jia, Xiaoping .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 204
[49]   Determining springs protection areas by combining an analytical model and vulnerability index [J].
Javadi, Saman ;
Moghaddam, Hamid Kardan ;
Roozbahani, Reza .
CATENA, 2019, 182
[50]   Assessment of Resilience Factors in Argentines Children in Familiar Vulnerability Conditions [J].
Susana Morelato, Gabriela .
UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 13 (04) :1473-1488