Assessment of watershed health, vulnerability and resilience for determining protection and restoration Priorities

被引:49
|
作者
Ahn, So-Ra [1 ]
Kim, Seong-Joon [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res Ctr Paso, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
[2] Konkuk Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Syst Engn, Seoul 05029, South Korea
关键词
Watershed health; SWAT; Vulnerability; Resilience; Protection and restoration priorities; CRITICAL SOURCE AREAS; LAND-USE CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GROUNDWATER RECHARGE; MANAGEMENT AREAS; CHANGE SCENARIOS; RIVER-BASIN; IMPACTS; MODEL; PHOSPHORUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.014
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The watershed health, vulnerability and recovery potential for determining protection and restoration priorities were assessed for the Han River basin (34,148 km(2)) in South Korea. Six components, including the watershed landscape, stream geomorphology, hydrology, water quality, aquatic habitat conditions, and biological conditions, were used to evaluate the watershed health (basin natural capacity). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was utilized to examine the hydrology and water quality components in the study basin, which includes 237 sub-watersheds, three multipurpose dams, one hydroelectric dam, and three multifunction weirs. Four components, namely, the future impervious area, future climate conditions, future water use, and recent land cover changes were used to evaluate the watershed vulnerability to artificial stressors. We determined the protection and restoration priorities by evaluating and comparing the health and vulnerability of each sub-watershed. Sixty-seven subwatersheds out of 237 were classified to have restoration priorities with high recovery potentials. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of meteorological drought for assessing watershed health using fuzzy-based reliability, resilience, and vulnerability
    Fooladi, Mahmood
    Golmohammadi, Mohammad H.
    Safavi, Hamid R.
    Singh, Vijay P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 66
  • [2] Assessment of drought change trends and watershed health using a reliability-resilience-vulnerability framework in mountainous watersheds
    Moghadam, Negar Tayebzadeh
    Malekmohammadi, Bahram
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 9
  • [3] Watershed reliability, resilience and vulnerability analysis under uncertainty using water quality data
    Hoque, Yamen M.
    Tripathi, Shivam
    Hantush, Mohamed M.
    Govindaraju, Rao S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 109 : 101 - 112
  • [4] Resilience thinking in health protection
    Castleden, Matthew
    McKee, Martin
    Murray, Virginia
    Leonardi, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 33 (03) : 369 - 377
  • [5] Quantitative assessment of adaptive measures on optimal water resources allocation by using reliability, resilience, vulnerability indicators
    Zou, Hui
    Liu, Dedi
    Guo, Shenglian
    Xiong, Lihua
    Liu, Pan
    Yin, Jiabo
    Zeng, Yujie
    Zhang, Jiayu
    Shen, Youjiang
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 34 (01) : 103 - 119
  • [6] From vulnerability to resilience Where should research priorities lie?
    Stroebe, Margaret
    BEREAVEMENT CARE, 2009, 28 (02) : 18 - 24
  • [7] Assessment of hydrologic vulnerability to urbanization and climate change in a rapidly changing watershed in the Southeast US
    Suttles, Kelly M.
    Singh, Nitin K.
    Vose, James M.
    Martin, Katherine L.
    Emanuel, Ryan E.
    Coulston, John W.
    Saia, Sheila M.
    Crump, Michael T.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 645 : 806 - 816
  • [8] Evaluation of the predictive reliability of a new watershed health assessment method using the SWAT model
    Jabbar, Fadhil K.
    Grote, Katherine
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (04)
  • [9] Integrated watershed modeling using interval valued fuzzy computations to enhance watershed restoration and protection at field-scale
    Srinivas, Rallapalli
    Das, Brajeswar
    Singhal, Anupam
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2022, 36 (05) : 1429 - 1445
  • [10] Determining Vulnerability Importance in Environmental Impact Assessment The case of Colombia
    Toro, Javier
    Duarte, Oscar
    Requena, Ignacio
    Zamorano, Montserrat
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 32 (01) : 107 - 117