Interventions during labor and birth in the United States: A qualitative analysis of women's experiences

被引:17
作者
Bibeau, Alana M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Sociol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
Intervention; Pregnancy; Birth; Qualitative research; United States; EXPECTATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.srhc.2014.10.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore and describe hospital-birthing women's understandings of and experiences with interventions during labor and birth. Methods: Qualitative data was collected as part of a larger ethnographic study of childbirth in the United States. The grounded theory method was employed to analyze interviews with 59 women from three states who had recently given birth in hospitals with physicians or certified nurse-midwives in attendance. Results: Four themes emerged from the data. The themes safety/risk and provider match, described women's expectations regarding intervention and their interactions with providers. A third theme addressed how women experienced interventions and their perceptions of control over decision-making. A final theme characterized women's satisfaction with maternity care. Conclusions: Women who received interventions expressed varying levels of comfort or apprehension associated with both expectations of maternity care and provider match. Women whose expectations matched those of the provider reported more positive experiences. Regardless of provider match, women expressed ambivalence about the use of interventions and confusion over their appropriate place. Women's ability to make sense of interventions was related to how well they navigated a complicated and bureaucratic maternity system. Increasing attention needs to be paid to the impact of these factors on women's perceptions of care during pregnancy and childbirth. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, OBSTET GYNECOL, V123, P693
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, Genetic maps and human imaginations: The limits of science in understanding who we are
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, INT J CHILDBIRTH ED
  • [4] A qualitative analysis of women's short accounts of labour and birth in a Western Australian public tertiary hospital
    Bayes, Sara
    Fenwick, Jennifer
    Hauck, Yvonne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2008, 53 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [5] Beck Ulrich., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
  • [6] Beck UlrichElizabeth Beck-Gernsheim., 2002, Individualization
  • [7] Corbin J., 2015, Basics of qualitative research, VFourth, DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
  • [8] Declercq E.R., 2013, Listening to Mothers III: Pregnancy and Birth
  • [9] Report of the Third National US Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences
  • [10] Downe S., 2006, BRIT J MIDWIFERY, V14, P352, DOI DOI 10.12968/BJOM.2006.14.6.21187