A comparative study on the risk of second primary cancers in out-of-field organs associated with radiotherapy of localized prostate carcinoma using Monte Carlo-based accelerator and patient models

被引:46
作者
Bednarz, Bryan [1 ]
Athar, Basit
Xu, X. George
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02108 USA
关键词
biomedical equipment; cancer; dosimetry; linear accelerators; Monte Carlo methods; phantoms; radiation therapy; risk management; FATAL SECONDARY MALIGNANCIES; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PROTON RADIOTHERAPY; CALCULATED RISK; RADIATION; IMPACT; IMRT; THERAPY; SURGERY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1118/1.3367012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using a detailed medical linear accelerator model and an anatomically realistic adult male whole-body phantom. A four-field box treatment, a four-field box treatment plus a six-field boost, and a seven-field IMRT treatment were simulated. Using BEIR VII risk models, the age-dependent lifetime attributable risks to various organs outside the primary beam with a known predilection for cancer were calculated using organ-averaged equivalent doses. Results: The four-field box treatment had the lowest treatment-related second primary cancer risks to organs outside the primary beam ranging from 7.3x10(-9) to 2.54x10(-5)%/MU depending on the patients age at exposure and second primary cancer site. The risks to organs outside the primary beam from the four-field box and six-field boost and the seven-field IMRT were nearly equivalent. The risks from the four-field box and six-field boost ranged from 1.39x10(-8) to 1.80x10(-5)%/MU, and from the seven-field IMRT ranged from 1.60x10(-9) to 1.35x10(-5)%/MU. The second cancer risks in all organs considered from each plan were below the baseline risks. Conclusions: The treatment-related second cancer risks in organs outside the primary beam due to 3D-CRT and IMRT is small. New risk assessment techniques need to be investigated to address the concern of radiation-induced second cancers from prostate treatments, particularly focusing on risks to organs inside the primary beam.
引用
收藏
页码:1987 / 1994
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Anderson Robert N, 2002, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V50, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ann ICRP 33
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ANN ICRP, V60
[4]  
[Anonymous], HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005
[6]   Neutron equivalent doses and associated lifetime cancer incidence risks for head & neck and spinal proton therapy [J].
Athar, Basit S. ;
Paganetti, Harald .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (16) :4907-4926
[7]   Increased risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiation: A population-based study [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Tepper, JE ;
Durham, SB ;
Rothenberger, DA ;
Virnig, BA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (04) :819-824
[8]   Calculated organ doses from selected prostate treatment plans using Monte Carlo simulations and an anatomically realistic computational phantom [J].
Bednarz, Bryan ;
Hancox, Cindy ;
Xu, X. George .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (17) :5271-5286
[9]   Monte Carlo modeling of a 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac medical accelerator for in-field and out-of-field dose calculations: development and validation [J].
Bednarz, Bryan ;
Xu, X. George .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (04) :N43-N57
[10]   Radiotherapy versus surgery for prostate cancer [J].
Bosch, X .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (05) :263-263