Erectile function recovery in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

被引:16
作者
Krishnan, R. [1 ]
Katz, D. [1 ]
Nelson, C. J. [2 ]
Mulhall, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Div Urol, Sexual & Reprod Med Program, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
erectile dysfunction; erectile function; non-nerve sparing; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; SUBJECTIVE CHARACTERIZATION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1111/andr.282
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Few studies have looked at erectile function recovery (EFR) rates in men undergoing non-nerve sparing resection during radical prostatectomy (RP). Existing studies show great variation in EFR rates owing to multiple factors that minimize their utility in counselling RP patients. We investigated the EFR rate and its predictors in unilateral cavernous nerve resection and bilateral cavernous nerve resection patients 24months after RP. We conducted a population-based, prospective cohort study of 966 patients who underwent RP at a tertiary cancer centre from 2008 to 2012. Cavernous nerve condition was evaluated on a 4-point nerve sparing score and assigned to one of three groups: bilateral sparing, unilateral resection (UNR) and bilateral nerve resection (BNR). EF was assessed pre-RP and 24-30months post-op using a validated 5-point patient-reported scale (1=fully rigid; 5=no tumescence). EFR was defined as a post-op EF grade of 1-2. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, anova, chi-square, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. Mean baseline EF was 1.84 +/- 1.3 and 2.74 +/- 1.5 for UNR and BNR patients respectively. Thirty-three percent of UNR patients and 13% of BNR patients exhibited EFR. Age, baseline EF were predictors of EFR. Multivariable analysis showed baseline EF was a significant predictor of EFR at 24months for UNR. For BNR patients, pre-RP EF was the only factor predictive of EFR. Patients undergoing nerve resection still have a significant chance of achieving true EFR, with UNR surgery patients showing more potential for improvement than patients undergoing BNR surgery. Age and baseline EFR characterize recovery prospects in these two groups. Physicians should thus measure and account for baseline EF in addition to age and the degree of nerve resection when advising patients about expectations for successful EF following RP.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 954
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Consumerism and its impact on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Alkhateeb, Sultan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1874 - 1878
  • [2] Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer
    Bill-Axelson, A
    Holmberg, L
    Ruutu, M
    Häggman, M
    Andersson, SO
    Bratell, S
    Spångberg, A
    Busch, C
    Nordling, S
    Garmo, H
    Palmgren, J
    Adami, HO
    Norlén, BJ
    Johansson, JE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) : 1977 - 1984
  • [3] Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment
    Burnett, Arthur L.
    Aus, Gunnar
    Canby-Hagino, Edith D.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Dmochowski, Roger R.
    Eton, David T.
    Forman, Jeffrey D.
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Hernandez, Javier
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Kraus, Stephen
    Liebert, Monica
    Moul, Judd W.
    Tangen, Catherine
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    Thompson, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (02) : 597 - 601
  • [4] Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy:: A systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome
    Dubbelman, Yuette D.
    Dohle, Gert R.
    Schroder, Frits H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (04) : 711 - 720
  • [5] Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Levinson, Adam W.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Ward, Nicholas T.
    Link, Richard E.
    Mettee, Lynda Z.
    Su, Li-Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) : 1510 - 1514
  • [6] Factors Predicting Preservation of Erectile Function in Men Undergoing Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
    Marien, Tracy
    Sankin, Alex
    Leport, Herbert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) : 1817 - 1822
  • [7] Subjective Characterization of Nerve Sparing Predicts Recovery of Erectile Function after Radical Prostatectomy: Defining the Utility of a Nerve Sparing Grading System
    Moskovic, Daniel J.
    Alphs, Hannah
    Nelson, Christian J.
    Rabbani, Farhang
    Eastham, James
    Touijer, Karim
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Mulhall, John P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (01) : 255 - 260
  • [8] An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites
    Mulhall, John P.
    Rojaz-Cruz, Cesar
    Mueller, Alexander
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [9] Defining and Reporting Erectile Function Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Challenges and Misconceptions
    Mulhall, John P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02) : 462 - 471
  • [10] Determinants of sexual satisfaction in men with prostate cancer
    Nelson, Christian J.
    Choi, Judy M.
    Mulhall, John P.
    Roth, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (05) : 1422 - 1427