Comparison of performance in breast lesions classification using radiomics and deep transfer learning: An assessment study

被引:2
作者
Danala, Gopichandh [1 ]
Maryada, Sai Kiran R. [2 ]
Pham, Huong [1 ]
Islam, Warid [1 ]
Jones, Meredith [3 ]
Zheng, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Comp Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Stephenson Sch Biomed Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2022年 / 12035卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Assessment of computer-aided diagnosis schemes; radiomics; deep transfer learning; automated breast lesion; classification; performance of CAD schemes; PREDICT; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1117/12.2611886
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Radiomics and deep transfer learning have been attracting broad research interest in developing and optimizing CAD schemes of medical images. However, these two technologies are typically applied in different studies using different image datasets. Advantages or potential limitations of applying these two technologies in CAD applications have not been well investigated. This study aims to compare and assess these two technologies in classifying breast lesions. A retrospective dataset including 2,778 digital mammograms is assembled in which 1,452 images depict malignant lesions and 1,326 images depict benign lesions. Two CAD schemes are developed to classify breast lesions. First, one scheme is applied to segment lesions and compute radiomics features, while another scheme applies a pre-trained residual net architecture (ResNet50) as a transfer learning model to extract automated features. Next, the same principal component algorithm (PCA) is used to process both initially computed radiomics and automated features to create optimal feature vectors by eliminating redundant features. Then, several support vector machine (SVM)-based classifiers are built using the optimized radiomics or automated features. Each SVM model is trained and tested using a 10-fold cross-validation method. Classification performance is evaluated using area under ROC curve (AUC). Two SVMs trained using radiomics and automated features yield AUC of 0.77 +/- 0.02 and 0.85 +/- 0.02, respectively. In addition, SVM trained using the fused radiomics and automated features does not yield significantly higher AUC. This study indicates that (1) using deep transfer learning yields higher classification performance, and (2) radiomics and automated features contain highly correlated information in lesion classification.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Opening the black box of machine learning in radiology: can the proximity of annotated cases be a way? [J].
Baselli, Giuseppe ;
Codari, Marina ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2020, 4 (01)
[2]   Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms [J].
Danala, Gopichandh ;
Patel, Bhavika ;
Aghaei, Faranak ;
Heidari, Morteza ;
Li, Jing ;
Wu, Teresa ;
Zheng, Bin .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 46 (09) :1419-1431
[3]   Applying Quantitative CT Image Feature Analysis to Predict Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients to Chemotherapy [J].
Danala, Gopichandh ;
Thai, Theresa ;
Gunderson, Camille C. ;
Moxley, Katherine M. ;
Moore, Kathleen ;
Mannel, Robert S. ;
Liu, Hong ;
Zheng, Bin ;
Qiu, Yuchen .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (10) :1233-1239
[4]   A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography [J].
Eltonsy, Nevine H. ;
Tourassi, Georgia D. ;
Elmaghraby, Adel S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2007, 26 (06) :880-889
[5]   Reality check: Perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers [J].
Fenton, JJ ;
Egger, J ;
Carney, PA ;
Cutter, G ;
D'Orsi, C ;
Sickles, EA ;
Fosse, J ;
Abraham, L ;
Taplin, SH ;
Barlow, W ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Elmore, JG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (01) :42-46
[6]   Histogram-Based Features Selection and Volume of Interest Ranking for Brain PET Image Classification [J].
Garali, Imene ;
Adel, Mouloud ;
Bourennane, Salah ;
Guedj, Eric .
IEEE JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL ENGINEERING IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2018, 6
[7]   Peering Into the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence: Evaluation Metrics of Machine Learning Methods [J].
Handelman, Guy S. ;
Kok, Hong Kuan ;
Chandra, Ronil V. ;
Razavi, Amir H. ;
Huang, Shiwei ;
Brooks, Mark ;
Lee, Michael J. ;
Asadi, Hamed .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (01) :38-43
[8]   Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition [J].
He, Kaiming ;
Zhang, Xiangyu ;
Ren, Shaoqing ;
Sun, Jian .
2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, :770-778
[9]   Improving the performance of CNN to predict the likelihood of COVID-19 using chest X-ray images with preprocessing algorithms [J].
Heidari, Morteza ;
Mirniaharikandehei, Seyedehnafiseh ;
Khuzani, Abolfazl Zargari ;
Danala, Gopichandh ;
Qiu, Yuchen ;
Zheng, Bin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 144
[10]   Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm [J].
Heidari, Morteza ;
Khuzani, Abolfazl Zargari ;
Hollingsworth, Alan B. ;
Danala, Gopichandh ;
Mirniaharikandehei, Seyedehnafiseh ;
Qiu, Yuchen ;
Liu, Hong ;
Zheng, Bin .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (03)