Comparison between hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor and activated sludge system: a pilot plant experiment

被引:64
作者
Di Trapani, Daniele [1 ]
Mannina, Giorgio [1 ]
Torregrossa, Michele [1 ]
Viviani, Gaspare [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dipartimento Ingn Idraul & Applicazioni Ambiental, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
关键词
biological treatment; HMBBR; hybrid biofilm reactors; municipal wastewater; nitrification; organic and nitrogen load; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; NITROGEN REMOVAL; NITRIFICATION;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2010.834
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper presents the comparison between the traditional activated sludge system (AS) and a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (HMBBR). In particular, an experimental campaign has been carried out at the WWTP in Palermo (Italy), on a pilot plant consisting of two pre-anoxic schemes. The aerated tank of the HMBBR line was filled with suspended carriers (AnoxKaldness(TM) K1), with a 30% filling ratio. The hydraulic load of the HMBBR line was increased up to two times the AS one. Further, in order to distinguish the additional contribution of the attached biomass for the HMBBR system, in the two lines the Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) was maintained as equal as possible. The monitoring period lasted three months during which several parameters were monitored. The obtained results showed a good treatment ability of the HMBBR system, referring to the organic matter removal as well as to the ammonium removal. in particular, in spite of the increase of the hydraulic load for the HMBBR line, the two systems showed a similar performance in terms of both organic and nitrogen removal. The results demonstrate the higher treatment capacity of the HMBBR addressing such system as an effective technology for the upgrading of overloaded wastewater treatment plants.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 902
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater [J].
Andreottola, G ;
Foladori, P ;
Ragazzi, M ;
Tatàno, F .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (4-5) :375-382
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, V19th
[3]  
Chave P., 2001, The EU Water Framework Directive
[4]   Treatment of municipal wastewater in a hybrid process using a new suspended carrier with large surface area [J].
Christensson, M ;
Welander, T .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 49 (11-12) :207-214
[5]   Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: a pilot plant experiment [J].
Di Trapani, D. ;
Mannina, G. ;
Torregrossa, M. ;
Viviani, G. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 57 (10) :1539-1545
[6]  
DITRAPANI D, 2008, P 1 IWA NAT YOUNG WA
[7]   Activated sludge biofilm wastewater treatment system [J].
Gebara, F .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (01) :230-238
[8]   Evaluation of hybrid processes for nitrification by comparing MBBR/AS and WAS configurations [J].
Germain, E. ;
Bancroft, L. ;
Dawson, A. ;
Hinrichs, C. ;
Fricker, L. ;
Pearce, P. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 55 (8-9) :43-49
[9]   Performance of a combined biofilm-suspended growth system for wastewater treatment [J].
Hamoda, MF ;
Al-Sharekh, HA .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (01) :167-175
[10]  
JIANLONG W, 2000, PROCESS BIOCHEM, V36, P297, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00153-9