Sustainability Standards: Interactions Between Private Actors, Civil Society, and Governments

被引:143
作者
Lambin, Eric F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thorlakson, Tannis [4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Earth Energy & Environm Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Earth & Life Inst, Georges Lemaitre Earth & Climate Res Ctr, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[4] Stanford Univ, Emmett Interdisciplinary Program Environm & Resou, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 43 | 2018年 / 43卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
certification; sourcing; agriculture; forestry; voluntary sustainability standard; private governance; GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORKS; IMPROVE LABOR STANDARDS; SUPPLY CHAINS; COFFEE CERTIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; PUBLIC REGULATION; META-GOVERNANCE; ROUND-TABLE; PALM OIL; MARKET;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025931
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
New partnerships between governments, private companies, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are reshaping global environmental governance. In particular, there has been a rise of voluntary sustainability standards in an attempt to manage social and environmental impacts of global supply chains. We analyze the large spectrum of interactions between private, public, and civil society actors around voluntary sustainability standards, primarily for tropical agriculture and forestry. This review uncovers a policy ecosystem dominated by a proliferation of standards that complement, substitute, or compete against each other, with coordination mechanisms beginning to arise. Contrary to widely held views, interactions between governments, NGOs, and private companies surrounding the adoption of sustainable practices are not generally antagonistic, and public and private environmental governance regimes rarely operate independently. The influence of these interactions on the effectiveness of sustainability standards needs more attention. Better understanding how private regulations interact with the policy ecosystem will help design more effective interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 393
页数:25
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
Abbott KennethW., 2009, VAND J TRANSNATL L, V42, P501
[2]   Trans-scalar embeddedness and governance deficits in global production networks: Crisis in South African fruit [J].
Alford, Matthew .
GEOFORUM, 2016, 75 :52-63
[3]   Reducing deforestation and enhancing sustainability in commodity supply chains: interactions between governance interventions and cattle certification in Brazil [J].
Alves-Pinto, Helena Nery ;
Newton, Peter ;
Fernando, Luis ;
Pinto, Guedes .
TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (04) :1053-1079
[4]   Complementary Labor Regulation: The Uncoordinated Combination of State and Private Regulators in the Dominican Republic [J].
Amengual, Matthew .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (03) :405-414
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ASIAN J SUSTAINABILI, DOI [10.1186/s41180-018-0018-y, DOI 10.1186/S41180-018-0018-Y]
[6]  
Arts B., 2002, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V9, P26, DOI [10.1002/csr.3, DOI 10.1002/CSR.3]
[7]  
Auld G., 2014, CONSTRUCTING PRIVATE
[8]   Confronting trade-offs and interactive effects in the choice of policy focus: Specialized versus comprehensive private governance [J].
Auld, Graeme .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2014, 8 (01) :126-148
[9]   The New Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Auld, Graeme ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Cashore, Benjamin .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 :413-435
[10]   Strategic activism and non market strategy [J].
Baron, David P. ;
Diermeier, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2007, 16 (03) :599-634