The Effects of Digital Written Feedback on Paper-based Tests for College Students

被引:4
作者
Lee, Hyeon Woo [1 ]
Cha, Yoon Mi [2 ]
机构
[1] Sangmyung Univ, Dept Educ, Hongjimun 2gil, Seoul 110743, South Korea
[2] Sangmyung Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Digital written feedback; Smart pad; Learning satisfaction; Perceived achievement; Attitudes; College students; INSTRUCTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s40299-021-00592-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Feedback is beneficial to students' learning process and overall achievement, but one of the common complaints from students about college education is regarding feedback. So, this study aimed to examine whether digital written feedback positively influences students' learning experience and attitude toward learning. Digital written feedback refers to feedback provided through a learning management system as handwritten feedback added to a scanned copy of the student's paper-based assessment using a smart pad and smart pencil. The study surveyed a diverse set of college students' (n = 175) perceptions regarding feedback satisfaction, learning satisfaction, the usefulness of digital written feedback, and perceived achievement via an online survey. A one-way analysis of variance found a significant difference between feedback satisfaction and learning satisfaction according to the feedback method. A multiple regression analysis indicated the satisfaction and perceived usefulness of digital written feedback predicted perceived achievement. From the students' open responses regarding the benefits of digital written feedback, five themes emerged, namely usability, psychological relief, accessibility, self-regulation, and acceptance. The implications for digital written feedback are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning
[2]  
BANGERTDROWNS RL, 1991, REV EDUC RES, V61, P213, DOI 10.3102/00346543061002213
[3]   Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences [J].
Barzilai, Sarit ;
Blau, Ina .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2014, 70 :65-79
[4]  
Blau I., 2008, Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2008: Learning in the technological era, P18
[5]   Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups [J].
Brandon, DP ;
Hollingshead, AB .
COMMUNICATION EDUCATION, 1999, 48 (02) :109-126
[6]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[7]  
Brodie L., 2009, P 20 AUSTR ASS ENG E, P756
[8]   FEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATED LEARNING - A THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS [J].
BUTLER, DL ;
WINNE, PH .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (03) :245-281
[9]  
Cameron B., 2005, J INTERACTIVE LEARNI, V16, P243
[10]   Collaboration and psychological ownership: how does the tension between the two influence perceived learning? [J].
Caspi, Avner ;
Blau, Ina .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2011, 14 (02) :283-298