Scientific disclosure and commercialization mode selection for university technology transfer

被引:19
作者
Chang, Xuhua [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
Fong, Patrick S. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
invention disclosure; commercialization mode selection; university technology transfer; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; KNOWLEDGE; INVENTIONS; CONTRACTS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scv011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Much previous research has explored university-industry technology transfer, but few researchers have examined the more comprehensive technology transfer process from faculty to firm. This paper focuses on faculty's decisions on invention disclosure and selection of the mode of commercialization, and it aims to fill this gap through developing game models involving faculty, university, and firm. The results reveal a series of specific conditions for each commercialization mode, indicating that faculty's share of licensing revenue and non-economic benefit have a positive impact on invention disclosure and the amount of effort expended by faculty, while increasing licensing price, decreasing the invention disclosure rate, and not necessarily increasing the investment by the firm. The empirical evidence supports our theory and renders a practical interpretation in the context of the 35 Chinese universities with the most patent applications. Finally, this paper provides new insights for faculty, university, and firm, as well as implications for policy-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 101
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Teams' boundary-spanning capacity at university: Performance of technology projects in commercialization
    Taheri, Mozhdeh
    van Geenhuizen, Marina
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 111 : 31 - 43
  • [22] Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University
    Vac, Calin S.
    Fitiu, Avram
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)
  • [23] A legal perspective on university technology transfer
    Hayter, Christopher S.
    Rooksby, Jacob H.
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (02) : 270 - 289
  • [24] Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue
    Heisey, Paul W.
    Adelman, Sarah W.
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2011, 36 (01) : 38 - 60
  • [25] The Efficiency of University Technology Transfer in China*
    Li, Dongfu
    Fu, Xiaoqing
    ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2021, 20 (03) : 114 - 137
  • [26] Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer
    Anderson, Timothy R.
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Lavoie, Francois F.
    TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (05) : 306 - 318
  • [27] University satellite institutes as exogenous facilitators of technology transfer ecosystem development
    Conle, Marcus
    Kroll, Henning
    Storz, Cornelia
    ten Brink, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2023, 48 (01) : 147 - 180
  • [28] 'Repeat commercializers,' the 'habitual entrepreneurs' of university-industry technology transfer
    Hoye, Kate
    Pries, Fred
    TECHNOVATION, 2009, 29 (10) : 682 - 689
  • [29] Impact of technology transfer offices on university spin-off bankruptcy
    Kirihata, Tetsuya
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2024,
  • [30] The Role of Technology Maturity Level in the Occurrence of University Technology Transfer
    Townes, Malcolm S.
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,