A review of sensitivity analysis practices in wind resource assessment

被引:60
作者
Tsvetkova, Olga [1 ]
Ouarda, Taha B. M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRS ETE, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Wind energy; Wind resource assessment; Sensitivity analysis; Global sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty analysis; OFFSHORE WIND; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY; ONSHORE WIND; POWER-GENERATION; LEVELIZED COST; PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-FEASIBILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; ENERGY SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114112
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
A review of sensitivity analysis in wind resource assessment is presented, offering classifications by sensitivity analysis output variable (or model), method, application, country, and software. No review of sensitivity analysis in wind resource assessment is currently available in the literature. The review pool consists of 102 articles with models dealing with statistical and economic aspects of wind resource assessment (goodness-of-fit metrics, wind power, wind energy, the net present value, the payback period, the internal rate of return, the payback period, the levelized cost of energy, capital and operational expenses). Sensitivity analysis studies, where the wind is predicted with weather research and forecasting models, sensitivity analysis of hybrid energy systems with a wind component, and sensitivity analysis of wind turbine fatigue loads, are beyond the scope of this review. This review reveals the lack of collective agreement on the definition of sensitivity analysis in the literature, the dominance of nonlinear models (100%), and the prevalence of one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis method (82%). The review highlights the existing gaps in the field, provides evidence of the common pitfalls, possibly leading to costly misinterpretations of the data at the site and hence to erroneous feasibility assessments. The review urges to rethink how to conduct sensitivity analysis in wind resource assessment. It also includes comparison of one-ata-time sensitivity analysis and global sensitivity analysis for a linear and nonlinear models.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 200 条
[71]  
Illingworth V., 1991, The Penguin Dictionary of Physics
[72]   A preliminary parametric techno-economic study of offshore wind floater concepts [J].
Ioannou, A. ;
Liang, Y. ;
Jalon, M. L. ;
Brennan, F. P. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 197
[73]  
Ioannou A, 2019, 2019 OFFSH EN STOR S
[74]   Stochastic financial appraisal of offshore wind farms [J].
Ioannou, Anastasia ;
Angus, Andrew ;
Brennan, Feargal .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 :1176-1191
[75]   A lifecycle techno-economic model of offshore wind energy for different entry and exit instances [J].
Ioannou, Anastasia ;
Angus, Andrew ;
Brennan, Feargal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 221 :406-424
[76]   Parametric CAPEX, OPEX, and LCOE expressions for offshore wind farms based on global deployment parameters [J].
Ioannou, Anastasia ;
Angus, Andrew ;
Brennan, Feargal .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2018, 13 (05) :281-290
[77]   Stochastic Prediction of Offshore Wind Farm LCOE through an Integrated Cost Model [J].
Ioannou, Anastasia ;
Angus, Andrew ;
Brennan, Feargal .
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, ICEER 2016, 2017, 107 :383-389
[78]  
Iooss A. B., 2021, PACKAGE SENSITIVITY
[79]   Decommissioning vs. repowering of offshore wind farms-a techno-economic assessment [J].
Jadali, A. M. ;
Ioannou, A. ;
Salonitis, K. ;
Kolios, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 112 (9-10) :2519-2532
[80]  
James A.L.R., 2009, Wind Energy Explained, Vsecond, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119994367