Valuation using multiple price list formats

被引:48
作者
Anderson, Steffen
Harrison, Glenn W. [1 ]
Lau, Morten I.
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Business Adm, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Copenhagen Sch Econ & Business Adm, Ctr Econ & Business Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Durham, Durham Business Sch, Durham, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00036840500462046
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the properties of a popular method for elicitation of valuations from experimental subjects, the multiple price list format. The main advantages of this format are that it is relatively transparent to subjects and provides simple incentives for truthful revelation. The main disadvantages are that it only elicits interval responses, and could be susceptible to framing effects. We consider extensions to address and evaluate these concerns in the context of eliciting willingness to pay for products. We find that the multiple price list can elicit relatively precise valuations for products, and that those valuations are robust to possible framing effects. It therefore offers an attractive procedure for eliciting valuations for goods.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 682
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN S, 2004, 0421 U CENTR FLOR DE
[2]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[3]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[4]  
Coller M., 1999, Experimental Economics, V2, P107, DOI 10.1007/BF01673482
[5]  
Davis Douglas D., 1993, EXP ECON
[6]  
Friedman Daniel., 1994, Experimental methods : a primer for economists
[7]  
Harrison Glenn, 2005, Field experiments in economics
[8]   Experimental evidence on alternative environmental valuation methods [J].
Harrison, GW .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (01) :125-162
[9]   Experimental methods and elicitation of values [J].
Harrison, GW ;
Harstad, RM ;
Rutström, EE .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 7 (02) :123-140
[10]  
HARRISON GW, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P1426