Identifying Continuous Quality Improvement Priorities in Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting

被引:5
作者
Preskitt, Julie [1 ]
Fifolt, Matthew [1 ]
Ginter, Peter M. [1 ]
Rucks, Andrew [1 ]
Wingate, Martha S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Care Org & Policy, RPHB 330,1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
Q-sort methodology; Affordable Care Act; continuous quality improvement; and Early Childhood Home Visiting; Alabama; Infant; home visiting; Maternal;
D O I
10.1097/PHH.0000000000000192
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this article was to describe a methodology to identify continuous quality improvement (CQI) priorities for one state's Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program from among the 40 required constructs associated with 6 program benchmarks. The authors discuss how the methodology provided consensus on system CQI quality measure priorities and describe variation among the 3 service delivery models used within the state. Design: Q-sort methodology was used by home visiting (HV) service delivery providers (home visitors) to prioritize HV quality measures for the overall state HV system as well as their service delivery model. Results: There was general consensus overall and among the service delivery models on CQI quality measure priorities, although some variation was observed. Measures associated with Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting benchmark 1, Improved Maternal and Newborn Health, and benchmark 3, Improvement in School Readiness and Achievement, were the highest ranked. Conclusions: The Q-sort exercise allowed home visitors an opportunity to examine priorities within their service delivery model as well as for the overall First Teacher HV system. Participants engaged in meaningful discussions regarding how and why they selected specific quality measures and developed a greater awareness and understanding of a systems approach to HV within the state. The Q-sort methodology presented in this article can easily be replicated by other states to identify CQI priorities at the local and state levels and can be used effectively in states that use a single HV service delivery model or those that implement multiple evidence-based models for HV service delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:E12 / E20
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Ammerman RT, 2007, J PREV INTERV COMMUN, V34, P89, DOI 10.1300/J005v34n01_05
[2]  
[Anonymous], HOM VIS UPD STAT PLA
[3]   Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology [J].
Cross, RM .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) :206-213
[4]   Q methodology in social work research [J].
Ellingsen, I. T. ;
Storksen, I. ;
Stephens, P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 13 (05) :395-409
[5]  
Ginter P.M., 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
[6]  
Kerlinger F.N., 1973, FDN BEHAV RES
[7]  
Kielhofner G, 2006, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
[8]   Rapid climate change and society: Assessing responses and thresholds [J].
Niemeyer, S ;
Petts, J ;
Hobson, K .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (06) :1443-1456
[9]  
Paulsell D., 2010, HOME VISITING EVIDEN
[10]  
Radawski D., 1999, J Physician Assistant Educ, V10, P12, DOI DOI 10.1097/01367895-199910010-00002