Prevention of Neurological Deficit With Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:2
作者
Farooq, Jeffrey [1 ]
Pressman, Elliot [1 ]
Elsawaf, Yasmeen [1 ]
McBride, Paul [1 ]
Alikhani, Puya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Neurosurg & Brain Repair, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion; complex spine surgery; intraoperative neuromonitoring; spine; SPINE SURGERY; MONITORING MIOM; MOTOR;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001249
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Objective: While intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been increasingly used in spine surgery to have a real-time evaluation of the neurological injury, we aim here to assess its utility during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and its association with postoperative neurological deficit. Summary of Background Data: ALIF is a beneficial surgical approach for patients with degenerative disease of the lower lumbar spine who would benefit from increased lordosis and restoration of neuroforaminal height. One risk of ALIF is iatrogenic nerve root injury. IONM may be useful in preventing this injury. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 111 consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a tertiary care academic center by 6 spine surgeons. We aimed to describe the association between IONM, postoperative weakness, and factors that predispose our center to using IONM. Results: The 111 patients had a median age of 62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 53-69 y]. Neuromonitoring was used in 67 patients (60.3%) and not used in 44 patients. Seven neuromonitoring patients had IONM changes during the surgery. Three of these patients' surgeries featured intraoperative adjustments to reduce iatrogenic neural injury. The IONM cohort underwent significantly more complex procedures [5 levels (IQR: 3-7) vs. 2 levels (IQR: 2-5), P=0.001]. There was no difference in rates of new or worsened postoperative weakness (IONM: 20.6%, non-IONM: 20.5%). Conclusions: We demonstrate evidence of the potential benefits of IONM for patients undergoing ALIF. Intraoperative changes in neuromonitoring signals resulted in surgical adjustments that likely prevented neurological deficits postoperatively. IONM was protective so that more complex surgeries did not have a higher rate of postoperative weakness.
引用
收藏
页码:E351 / E355
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations
    Bhagat, S.
    Durst, A.
    Grover, H.
    Blake, J.
    Lutchman, L.
    Rai, A. S.
    Crawford, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (07) : 1399 - 1407
  • [2] Combined Muscle Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumour Surgery
    Choi, Il
    Hyun, Seung-Jae
    Kang, Joong-Koo
    Rhim, Seung-Chul
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (04) : 1063 - 1071
  • [3] Editorial
    Compston, Alastair
    [J]. BRAIN, 2010, 133 : 2835 - 2837
  • [4] Correlation of pain, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life with radiological grading scales of lumbar degenerative disc disease
    Corniola, M. -V.
    Stienen, M. N.
    Joswig, H.
    Smoll, N. R.
    Schaller, K.
    Hildebrandt, G.
    Gautschi, O. P.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2016, 158 (03) : 499 - 505
  • [5] Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine and spinal cord surgery
    Costa, P.
    Bruno, A.
    Bonzanino, M.
    Massaro, F.
    Caruso, L.
    Vincenzo, I.
    Ciaramitaro, P.
    Montalenti, E.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2007, 45 (01) : 86 - 91
  • [6] Vulnerability of the L5 nerve root during anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: case series and review of the literature
    Dowlati, Ehsan
    Alexander, Hepzibha
    Voyadzis, Jean-Marc
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2020, 49 (03) : 1 - 9
  • [7] THE SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF OSSIFICATION OF THE POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT IN 51 PATIENTS
    EPSTEIN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1993, 6 (05): : 432 - 455
  • [8] The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery Does It Make a Difference?
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) : S37 - S46
  • [9] Guidelines for the Use of Electrophysiological Monitoring for Surgery of the Human Spinal Column and Spinal Cord
    Hadley, Mark N.
    Shank, Christopher D.
    Rozzelle, Curtis J.
    Walters, Beverly C.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (05) : 713 - 732
  • [10] Haghighi S S, 2009, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V49, P223