Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation

被引:7
作者
Wüthrich, RP [1 ]
Cicvara, S [1 ]
Ambühl, PM [1 ]
Binswanger, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CsA dosage; low-risk kidney transplant recipients; mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine; conversion; prednisone; short-term graft survival; six-month trial;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/15.8.1228
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. In the first year after renal allograft transplantation, triple therapy immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), prednisone (P), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to a triple therapy treatment that includes azathioprine (AZA) instead of MMF. Whether long-term treatment with CsA-P-MMF is better than treatment with CsA-P-AZA is a matter of debate, as 3-year graft survival is similar in MMF- and AZA-treated patients. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of changing MMF to AZA in low-risk renal allograft recipients 6 months after transplantation. Method. This was a randomized, open-label single-centre study, recruiting 48 low risk renal allograft recipients on CsA-P-MMF therapy 6 months after transplantation, comparing the outcome with continued MMF treatment (2 g b.i.d.) (group A, n=22) or switching MMF to AZA (1 mg/kg) treatment (group B, n=26). Results. The outcome after a 6-months follow-up of patients in group A and group B was similar. Treatment failure rates (defined as clinically diagnosed acute rejection episodes) were 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B. There were no patient deaths and no graft failures during the 6-months observation period. Graft function was excellent and similar in both groups. Conclusion. Replacing MMF with AZA 6 months after transplantation in low-risk renal allograft recipients is safe and is not associated with altered graft function in the short term.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1231
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Behrend M, 1999, TRANSPLANTATION, V68, P391
[2]  
Cho S, 1999, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V34, P296
[3]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[4]   Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients - A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection [J].
Halloran, P ;
Mathew, T ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Groth, C ;
Hooftman, L ;
Barker, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (01) :39-47
[5]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[6]   Clear benefit of mycophenolate mofetil-based triple therapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after living donor renal transplantations [J].
Kim, YS ;
Moon, JI ;
Kim, SI ;
Park, K .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (04) :578-581
[7]   MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS [J].
SOLLINGER, HW .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (03) :225-232
[9]   Reduced kidney transplant rejection rate and pharmacoeconomic advantage of mycophenolate mofetil [J].
Wüthrich, RP ;
Weinreich, T ;
Ambühl, PM ;
Schwarzkopf, AK ;
Candinas, D ;
Binswanger, U .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 14 (02) :394-399