Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing

被引:2
作者
Mansbridge, Michael [1 ]
Park, Sunju [1 ]
Tamaoka, Katsuo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Languages & Cultures, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Languages & Cultures, Chikusa Ku, Furo Cho, Nagoya, Aichi 4668601, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Korean; Relative clauses; Eye-tracking; Experience; Ambiguity; EYE-TRACKING; LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY; SUBJECT; MEMORY; INTERFERENCE; FREQUENCY; MODEL; ERP;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-016-9461-z
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Previous studies on Korean relative clauses (RC) show that, with respect to processing, object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) are more difficult to process at the head noun than subject-extracted relative clauses within temporarily ambiguous contexts. ORCs, however, are predicted by experience-based processing models to incur a greater processing cost during early processing stages at the RC verb, since it is a likely locus of disambiguation for RCs in Korean, and because ORCs are a less frequent structure. Consequently, the current study investigates whether processing difficulty for ORCs manifests itself at the RC verb using eye-tracking methods, a simple sentence structure and a sentential-decision task. The results revealed significantly increased go-past reading times for ORCs at the RC verb. We believe this is a result of a less frequent structure being more difficult to parse during disambiguation. Accordingly, experience-based models of processing can accurately predict difficulty for ORCs in Korean.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 845
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[2]  
Bates D., 2014, J Stat Softw, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
[3]   Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing [J].
Caplan, David ;
Chen, Evan ;
Waters, Gloria .
CORTEX, 2008, 44 (03) :257-275
[4]   Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Vergara, Marta ;
de la Cruz-Pavia, Irene ;
Laka, Itziar .
COGNITION, 2010, 115 (01) :79-92
[5]  
Chomsky N., 1995, Step by step, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0022226702271625
[6]  
Chomsky Noam, 1965, Aspects of the theory of syntax
[7]  
Clifton C., 1989, Linguistic structure in language processing, P273, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_8
[8]  
Clifton Charles Jr., 2007, P341, DOI 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50017-3
[9]   Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity [J].
Demberg, Vera ;
Keller, Frank .
COGNITION, 2008, 109 (02) :193-210
[10]  
Dryer M. S., 2013, The world atlas of language structures online