Six critical dimensions: A model for widening participation in open, online and blended programs

被引:14
作者
Lambert, Sarah R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Geelong, Vic, Australia
关键词
equity; inclusion; disadvantage; design model; qualitative synthesis; MOOC; FACILITATION; COMMUNITY; EDUCATION; COURSES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.14742/ajet.5683
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Working from the perspective of open and online learning for widening participation in higher education, this article advances a new conceptual model to guide practitioners and researchers in maximising the enablers and minimising the constraints to foundation level online learning for equity students. The model is adapted from technology for social inclusion research addressing persistent inequalities in Internet use. First, the proposed model is introduced with definitions for the six dimensions (course purpose, technology, social support, autonomy, learning materials and skills) and research propositions for how the dimensions enable and constrain learning. A qualitative synthesis of empirically tested open and online programs (including massive open online courses) is used to clarify how the six critical dimensions interact to enable and constrain diverse learners in distance and blended modes. Results support the model with new definitions for each dimension in light of unexpected findings: courses designed to enable particular groups; breadth of learner supports; technology amplifying other dimensions; and aspects of the model designed to empower disadvantaged learners. This model should assist course design research and practice at higher education institutions where open and online provision for diverse and educationally disadvantaged learners is the current or approaching reality. Implications for practice or policy: Learning designers and educators can use the new model to work on improvements to the quality and support of their blended or online courses at the same time as increasing equity. Course access, progression and success rates could be improved overall by lifting outcomes for all learners, including transitioning, foundational and non-traditional or equity students. Researchers of digital equity can use the model as an analytic tool to evaluate open and online courses.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 182
页数:22
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy [J].
Anderson, Terry ;
Dron, Jon .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2011, 12 (03) :80-97
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ICDE REPORT SERIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 10 INT C NETW LEAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], TECHNOLOGY SOCIAL IN
[5]  
[Anonymous], OPEN LEARNING J OPEN
[6]  
[Anonymous], ENCY ACTIVISM SOCIAL
[7]  
[Anonymous], DISTRUSTING ED TECHN
[8]  
[Anonymous], CURRENT THINKING 7CS
[9]  
[Anonymous], MOOCS COMMUNITY ORIE
[10]  
[Anonymous], THERE BACK CHARTING