TrainAR: A Scalable Interaction Concept and Didactic Framework for Procedural Trainings Using Handheld Augmented Reality

被引:12
作者
Blattgerste, Jonas [1 ]
Luksch, Kristina [2 ]
Lewa, Carmen [3 ]
Pfeiffer, Thies [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Emden Leer, Fac Technol, Constantiapl 4, D-26723 Emden, Germany
[2] Hsch Gesundheit Bochum, Inst Angew Gesundheitsforsch Midwifery & Reprod H, Gesundheitscampus 6-8, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Zentrum Med Lehre, Univ Str 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
关键词
mobile; handheld; augmented reality; mixed reality; procedural; education; learning; training; framework; interaction concept; midwifery; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; CONSTRUCTION; STUDENT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.3390/mti5070030
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The potential of Augmented Reality (AR) for educational and training purposes is well known. While large-scale deployments of head-mounted AR headsets remain challenging due to technical limitations and cost factors, advances in mobile devices and tracking solutions introduce handheld AR devices as a powerful, broadly available alternative, yet with some restrictions. One of the current limitations of AR training applications on handheld AR devices is that most offer rather static experiences, only providing descriptive knowledge with little interactivity. Holistic concepts for the coverage of procedural knowledge are largely missing. The contribution of this paper is twofold. We propose a scalabe interaction concept for handheld AR devices with an accompanied didactic framework for procedural training tasks called TrainAR. Then, we implement TrainAR for a training scenario in academics for the context of midwifery and explain the educational theories behind our framework and how to apply it for procedural training tasks. We evaluate and subsequently improve the concept based on three formative usability studies (n = 24), where explicitness, redundant feedback mechanisms and onboarding were identified as major success factors. Finally, we conclude by discussing derived implications for improvements and ongoing and future work.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality crossMark for education: A systematic review of the literature
    Akcayir, Murat
    Akcayir, Gokce
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017, 20 : 1 - 11
  • [2] Anderson L. W., 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision ofBloom's Taxonomyof Educational Objectives, DOI DOI 10.7771/1541-5015.1355
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, TECHKNOWLOGIA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, The International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, DOI DOI 10.19173/IRRODL.V6I2.237
  • [5] Framework for designing motivational augmented reality applications in vocational education and training
    Bacca, Jorge
    Baldiris, Silvia
    Fabregat, Ramon
    Kinshuk
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 35 (03) : 102 - 117
  • [6] Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
  • [7] Billinghurst M., 2008, ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA, V7
  • [8] Blattgerste J., 2020, DELFI 2020 18 FACHTA
  • [9] Authorable Augmented Reality Instructions for Assistance and Training in Work Environments
    Blattgerste, Jonas
    Renner, Patrick
    Pfeiffer, Thies
    [J]. MUM 2019: 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AND UBIQUITOUS MULTIMEDIA, 2019,
  • [10] Augmented Reality Action Assistance and Learning for Cognitively Impaired People - A Systematic Literature Review
    Blattgerste, Jonas
    Renner, Patrick
    Pfeiffer, Thies
    [J]. 12TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO ASSISTIVE ENVIRONMENTS (PETRA 2019), 2019, : 270 - 279