Hypnosis intervention for the management of pain perception during cataract surgery

被引:12
作者
Chen, Xiaofan [1 ]
Yuan, Rongdi [1 ]
Chen, Xiao [2 ]
Sun, Min [2 ]
Lin, Sen [2 ]
Ye, Jian [2 ]
Chen, Chunlin [2 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Xinqiao Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 83 Xinqiao Main St, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Ophthalmol, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2018年 / 11卷
关键词
pain; patient satisfaction; cataract surgery; hypnosis; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; OPHTHALMIC SURGERY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PATIENT; SUGGESTION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S174490
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of hypnosis in pain management during cataract surgery. Methods: Male or female patients with bilateral age-related cataract who wished to have both eyes subjected to phacoemulsification surgery were preliminarily admitted. Immediately after the first-eye surgery, each patient was evaluated for pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and patients with a VAS score >1 were enrolled. By using block randomization, the enrolled patients were allocated to either the treatment group, which received a hypnosis intervention before the scheduled second-eye surgery, or the control group, which did not undergo hypnosis. The levels of anxiety, pain, and cooperation were evaluated independently by the patients and the surgeon. Results: During the intraoperative pain assessment, 5%, 34%, 38%, and 23% of patients in the control group reported experiencing no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain, respectively. In contrast, in the hypnosis group, 18%, 56%, 15%, and 11% of patients reported experiencing no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain, respectively, which showed significant differences between the groups (P<0.005). The evaluation of anxiety level showed that the mean score in the control group and hypnosis group was 11.77 +/- 0.32 and 6.64 +/- 0.21, respectively, revealing a highly significant difference between the two groups (P<0.005). The assessment of patient cooperation showed that only 5% and 18% o f patients in the control group and 18% and 36% of patients in the hypnosis group showed excellent and good cooperation, respectively, while 47% of patients in the control group and only 24% of patients in the hypnosis group exhibited poor cooperation, revealing significant differences between the groups (P<0.005). Conclusion: Hypnosis may be considered as an auxiliary measure in cataract surgery, especially for patients who experienced obvious pain during the first-eye surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1921 / 1926
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] A role for hypnosis in cataract surgery: Report of 171 procedures
    Agard, E.
    Pernod, C.
    El Chehab, H.
    Russo, A.
    Haxaire, M.
    Dot, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2016, 39 (03): : 287 - 291
  • [2] Differences in pain experience and cooperation between consecutive surgeries in patients undergoing phacoemulsification
    Akkaya, Sezen
    Ozkurt, Yelda Buyru
    Aksoy, Sibel
    Kokcen, Hatice Kubra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 37 (03) : 545 - 552
  • [3] Hypnosis as an effective and inexpensive option to control pain in transcatheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias
    Barbero, Umberto
    Ferraris, Federico
    Muro, Milena
    Budano, Carlo
    Anselmino, Matteo
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (01) : 18 - 21
  • [4] The effect of hypnosis on pain and peripheral blood flow in sickle-cell disease: a pilot study
    Bhatt, Ravi R.
    Martin, Sarah R.
    Evans, Subhadra
    Lung, Kirsten
    Coates, Thomas D.
    Zeltzer, Lonnie K.
    Tsao, Jennie C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 1635 - 1644
  • [5] Pain Perception in Phacoemulsification with Topical Anesthesia and Evaluation of Factors Related with Pain
    Dadaci, Zeynep
    Borazan, Mehmet
    Acir, Nursen Oncel
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 46 (04): : 151 - 155
  • [6] Erickson MH, 2009, AM J CLIN HYPN, V51, P341
  • [7] Ezra D. G., 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V18
  • [8] Supplementary intracameral lidocaine for phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia
    Ezra, Daniel G.
    Nambiar, Anil
    Allan, Bruce D.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (03) : 455 - 463
  • [9] Facco E, 2016, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V82, P1343
  • [10] Is second eye phacoemulsification really more painful?
    Hari-Kovacs, Andras
    Lovas, Peter
    Facsko, Andrea
    Crate, Ian D.
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2012, 124 (15-16) : 516 - 519